These results all showed that memory diseases still showed a highly significant effect on stroke ( p < 0.001). 3.2 Correlation between memory diseases and stroke risk Based on the three models constructed in this study, memory diseases were significantly associated with stroke in all three models (Model I, OR = 7.33, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 5.31–9.94; Model II, OR = 6.08, p < 0.00
Excerpts
On all three tested Castanopsis species, Kruskal-Wallis tests revealed highly significant differences in lesion length among the three groups (CK, BZ-FL-1, BZ-FL-3) ( C. carlesii : χ 2 (2) = 22.388, p < 0.001; C. faberi : χ 2 (2) = 19.631, p < 0.001; C. hystrix : χ 2 (2) = 21.805, p < 0.001).
A one-way within-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a highly significant effect of condition on intelligibility, F (7, 161) = 40.187, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.636.
This cluster exhibited the highest relative risk (RR = 132.43), far exceeding the expected number of cases (0.031), and showed a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001).
A 4 (Character Style) × 2 (Participant Gender) mixed-design repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of character style on perceived realism, F (3, 84) = 130.72, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.78.
The statistical analysis showed highly significant effects of extract type (F = 1069.930, p < 0.001), plant part (F = 691.704, p < 0.001), and their interaction (F = 225.165, p < 0.001) on total polyphenol content (TPC).
Further confirming the visual impression, planned post-hoc one-tailed t-tests on CS+>CS− difference scores showed no significant activation during early conditioning [UF-Cond1: t(16) = 0.28, p = 0.393], an already significant, though rather weak, reaction during late conditioning [UF-Cond2: t(16) = 2.11, p = 0.025] and a strong and highly significant reaction to the CS+ during testing [UF-Test: t(16) = 3.81, p = 0.001].
The between-group difference in post−intervention cycle duration was highly significant (P<0.001), and the between-group difference in cycle reduction was 6.79 days (95% CI: 0.14-1.02, P = 0.008) ( Table 5 ).
From A1 to A2, the IG lost 7.36 ± 7.09 kg, while the CG showed a small inverse change of -0.10 ± 7.33 kg, yielding a highly significant between-group difference (p = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.35), indicative of a large effect size.
2 , grain yield of the tested genotypes increased by a factor of 2.5 between 1915 and 2022 and the genotypic variability for yield was highly significant (F(13, 70) = 18.30, P < 0.001).
3.3 Symbiotic performance 3.3.1 First trial Nonparametric Spearman Rank analyses revealed positive and highly significant correlations between NN and NDW (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), NDW and SDW (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), NDW and TNS (r = 0.89, p < 0.001), SDW and TNS (r = 0.94, p < 0.001), and between SDW and RE (r = 0.93).
A highly significant positive correlation (0.643; p <0.001) could be observed between usefulness and comprehensiveness of the videos, together with negative correlations between the visualization rate and usefulness (-0.186; p <0.05), and visualization rate and comprehensiveness (-0.183; p <0.05).
This difference remained highly significant on day 7 (p < 0.001).
Differences between the post-treatment and waitlist groups on PTSD symptom scales were highly significant ( p < 0.001), with moderate to large effect sizes on changes in both the frequency and severity of symptoms.
The final multivariate logistic regression model was highly significant overall (omnibus test: χ2 = 43.944, df = 6, p < 0.001) and accounted for 35.9% of the variance in the presence of metabolic syndrome among IBS patients (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.359).
The trend test is highly significant (Z = −26.20, P < 0.001), indicating the miss rate has generally been increasing in the last 20 years.
In our analysis, this association is highly significant ( χ 2 48 =378.53; P <.001).
The difference between the non‐functionalized and the two functionalized hydrogels was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
A two-way nested ANOSIM revealed a highly significant but small (low R value) difference between sites within a cove (global R = 0.25 P < 0.001).
Standardized estimates as shown in Table 6 , the pathway from AR-A to TE was strong and highly significant (β = 0.42, p < .001, z = 4.878), while the subsequent pathway from TE to DT was equally robust (β = 0.47, p < .001, z = 4.942).
Moreover, ANOVA results ( Table 8 ) confirmed a highly significant relationship (P < 0.001) between the soil EC and the selected predictors.
Though the correlation was overall still highly significant between Step-wise and Simultaneous models (L-TLE, rho = 0.58, P < 0.001, R-TLE, rho = 0.55, P < 0.001), all Step-wise correlations in the L-TLE versus R-TLE task were significantly lower than in the HC versus TLE task (all Fisher’s Z s > 10.5, P s < 0.001).
This difference was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.001).
The interaction term between negative sentiment and Horizon Worlds was highly significant ( β = 47.4 , p < 0.001), indicating that negativity in this specific context is exceptionally viral, a finding consistent with platform governance literature on “outrage economies” [ 34 ].
This relationship followed a clear graded pattern: a highly significant association was found between the index finger vein position and the level of pneumonia severity (p<0.001, Cramer’s V=0.729), as shown in table 2 .