Excerpts

ToM and NP variable As shown in Table 1 , the findings in this study indicated that PtTBI performed poorly than in the HC group on the entire ToM tasks, that is, both verbal and nonverbal task and cognitive and affective task, as the mean difference between groups was highly significant ( P < .001).

No significant differences between the groups were observed in the slow-4 range, however, a cluster (k = 24) in the left DLPFC showed a trend at the voxel-level p = 0.001, T = 3.3, Z = 3.15, MNI: − 33, 21, 48 that did not survive at the cluster-corrected level p FDR = 0.56.

Moreover, the HFE score showed a highly significant positive correlation with the EB score (r = 0.573, p < 0.001) and the FM score (r = 0.384, p < 0.001).

Except for the ≥ 100 years old group, BMI in other age groups also showed a trend of increasing with the years (p < 0.001) in Fig. 2 B.

SEEG demonstrated superior discriminative power, yielding highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) across the majority of frequency bands and topological features.

Furthermore, in a two-factor ANOVA, the interaction of carcass rates with capture method and period was highly significant (F 2,306 = 227.23, MSE = 0.109, p < 0.001), as mean carcass rates increased for both trap and shotgun over the Early and Pre-ban periods, but only increased for shotgun Post-ban ( S1 Fig ).

Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed highly significant reductions in MADRS total scores compared with baseline at all follow-ups (all adjusted p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S1 ).

Fisher’s exact tests confirmed highly significant contrasts for these variants (Man_R-S and Man_C-S, p < 0.001).

Mixed effects analyses with the factors ROI (excluding the hand ROI), hemisphere, and map demonstrated that there were highly significant effects of ROI ( F (3, 600) = 60.69, P < 0.001) and hemisphere ( F (1, 600) = 43.54, P < 0.001) but no significant effect of map ( F (3, 600) < 1, n.s.).

Furthermore, Egger’s test statistics confirmed the presence of marginally significant publication bias at a P-value < 0.001 ( Table 4 ). 3.5.

Since both dish and container random effects were highly significant (P<0.001), we included them in subsequent models.

This segregation was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).

Since the relationship between perceived control and mortality in Russia differed from the Czech and Polish cohorts (in which the associations were similar), with highly significant interaction term in men (p<0.001), we were unable to pool the data from all three cohorts but we could combine the Polish and Czech data.

Given the large sample size, these changes were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Logistic regression analysis between MSC and postoperative complications was highly significant ( P =0.001, χ2=25).

A two-tailed Student’s t-test indicated that the difference in total CFU was highly significant ( P <0.001).

In our multivariate ANOVA on the non-normalized data, the main effect of training over the time course was highly significant, F (7, 34) = 46.20, p < 0.001.

However, an extremely significant age effect was observed in relation to both NgR (F 2,30 = 104.653; P <0.001) and p75 (F 2,30 = 22.782; P <0.001) protein levels in the prefrontal cortex of the treated rats.

Mean Corpuscular Volume showed a highly significant peak LOD score of 6.8 on chromosome 7 at 79 Mb and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Content had a peak LOD score of 8.2 on chromosome 7 at 86 Mb (corrected p values < 0.001, Fig. 3C, 3D ).

Highly significant coefficients of correlation were observed, ranging from weak to moderate (p<0.001).

Serum uPA, fPSA, %fPSA, P2PSA, and PHI levels showed highly significant difference between three studied groups (p ≤ 0.001).

In the category with the greatest increase in commuting level, highly significant excesses (P <0.001) of leukaemia are present at ages 0-4 and 0-14 (observed to expected ratios 1.76 based on 46 cases, and 1.50, based on 79 cases).

With the addition of PL, the ternary SDs showed highly significant (***, p < 0.001) changes in the SL release profile ( Fig. 3 ).

5-HT enhanced the maximum anti-tumour response to the DMXAA/CI- 1010 combination; the effect of 5-HT was statistically significant in one of the two experiments, and was highly significant (P=0.001) if both experiments were pooled.

Those with high technological engagement reported significantly greater use of GAI (M = 337.88) compared to those with moderate engagement (M = 253.79), with a highly significant result (t = 6.518, p < 0.001).