Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Ratings of negative emotions The main effect of the regulation type was found to be highly significant ( F (2,174) = 303, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.777): participants reported fewer negative feelings in the reappraisal (3.0 ± 1.1) and distraction blocks (3.0 ± 1.0) when compared with the passive view (no-regulation) block (5.6 ± 1.1, p s < 0.001), whereas the negative feelings between the reappraisal and distraction blocks did not differ ( p = 1.000).
highly significantP-value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of anthropometric and body composition characteristics with respect to BMI category revealed a highly significant (P-value < 0.001) increase in fat mass, muscle mass, and BF% with an increment in BMI category [ Table 3 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Using the NIPS pain score of the OS-NPA as the golden standard, the result showed a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and inter-rater reliability for both single and average measures between the VB-NPA, with neonatal pain videos captured in a real-world NICU scenario, and OS-NPA, with a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The only correlation identified as to sex was the presence of higher levels of diastolic blood pressure in males (p = 0.02) There was a strong correlation between the presence of overweight and the occurrence of high blood pressure, as shown by highly significant direct linear regression (p < 0.001) between BMI Z and blood pressure Z, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure ( Figure 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On average, after CET a highly significant increase of the corneal temperature of 0.56°C for the RE and 0.48°C for the LE ( p < 0.001 for both eyes) was observed and after cm-CET there was a significant decrease of 0.11°C for the RE and 0.20°C in the LE (RE p = 0.04 and LE p = 0.024 for both eyes) ( Figure 2(a) ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Specifically, a highly significant effect was observed in leaf area (F(2, 5) = 550.764, p < 0.001), as well as in the number of runners (F(2, 5) = 112.069, p < 0.001), number of white flowers (F(2, 5) = 39.168, p = 0.001), number of fruits (F(2, 5) = 82.18, p < 0.001), average weight of fruits (F(2, 5) = 141.327, p < 0.001), number of leaves (F(2, 5) = 1342.394, p < 0.001), and crop appearance (F(2, 5) = 99.39, p < 0.001).
highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Wilcoxon rank-sum tests comparing SSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the short sleep and combined long/intermediate sleep categories, and LSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the long sleep and combined short/intermediate sleep categories, revealed highly significant differences (P<0.001), confirming that SSPGI, LSPGI, and SDPGI effectively distinguish between the respective sleep duration categories.
Associations between VDR FokI and ApaI genotypes and alleles with ISPTB did not reach statistical significance (ORs and 95% CI), whereas the presence of the G allele in newborns increased the risk for ISPTB 3.63 times (95% CI = 1.88–7.01, p < 0.001).