Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
CA analysis of the entire Sandbian ( gracilis and bicornis biozones) ostracod fauna revealed a clear latitudinal signal, with all southern marginal localities lying on the right side of the first CA axis, and most midcontinent localities on the left ( Figure 4a ); this relation with latitude was highly significant (CCA, p<0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After extending the model to include systemic metabolic measurements—such as hemodynamic indicators, HbA1c as a marker of glucose regulation, serum lipids, hepatic enzyme levels, and kidney‐related biochemical markers—the TyG–HUA link remained robust and highly significant in Model 2 ( p < 0.001).
marginally significantp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Bacterioplankton Community Structure Abundances of the bacterioplankton phylogenetic groups detected by CARD-FISH generally covaried with total bacterioplankton cells as shown by highly significant linear correlations of all phylogenetic groups (mean r 2 = 0.73, range 0.62–0.90; p < 0.001) except the Polaribacter cluster ( Figure 5 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
By contrast, the age and sex-adjusted hazard ratios in people diagnosed with substance use disorders and with personality disorders were 1.94 (1.38–2.72) and 1.89 (1.34–2.65), respectively, and remained highly significant (p < 0.001) and largely unchanged after further adjustment for criminal history factors (Table 1 ).
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When we performed a Kaplan–Meier analysis including all the four groups (groups 1–3 and the HER2-positive group), group 2 (characterised by weak or negative ER and HER2 expression, and high OPN and low ALCAM expression) turned out to contain predominantly high-risk cases with highly significant differences in DFS ( P <0.001) and OAS ( P =0.001) compared with all the other groups ( Figure 2B and C , respectively).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
According to the cut-off value determined by ROC analysis for SII, median PFS was 5 months (95% CI, 2.94–7.06) in the low SII group and 4 months (95% CI, 2.79–5.21) in the high SII group, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).