Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There were highly significant power suppressions during motor imagery compared to baseline, both in the alpha band (Figure 2 A -left panel; 8–12 Hz, [0 1] s after stimulus onset: p < 0.001; [−1 0] s before response: p < 0.001) and in the beta band (Figure 3 A -left panel; 16–24 Hz, [0 1] s after stimulus onset: p < 0.001; [−1 0] s before response: p < 0.001).
nominally significantP ≤ 0.0010.0× alphagold
The significance of the enrichment of nominally significant eSTRs (SigSTRs, P ≤ 0.001), eSTRs (eSTRs, FDR < 1%) and fine-mapping eSTRs (FMeSTRs, FDR < 1% & CAVIAR score > 0.1) in the above mentioned genomic feature regions was determined by using Fisher’s exact test in the R program.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The effect was dose-dependent and highly significant when compared to the control (ANOVA overall effect p < 0.001 with significant Dunnett’s procedure, for concentrations of 0.75% and higher; chi-square test overall effect p < 0.0001 with Fischer’s exact test for each concentration vs. control p << 0.05).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Depending on the significance threshold values ( P ), the statistical analysis of the MDA values reveals significant differences ( P < 0.01) between the AHT + P and the AHT groups, respectively, and highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) between the AHT and the W groups.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The control scale Openness showed highly significant correlations with almost all other TSS scales [ Emotional instability r = 0.54 ( p < 0.001); Aggressiveness r = 0.43 ( p < 0.001); Extraversion r = −0.26 ( p < 0.05); Empathy r = −0.29 ( p < 0.05); Achievement motivation r = 0.01 ( ns ); Rigidity r = −0.37 ( p < 0.01)], indicating the need for partial correlations in order to analyze the correlations between personality dimensions and performance criteria.
highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison of the mean CFU (×10 6 ) count within the 2% CHX gel group and the 2% CHX with chitosan group at different time intervals (S1,S2,S3) was found to be highly significant (P = 0.001); whereas in group II, it was significant (P = 0.002).