The semi-quantitative analysis of the immunohistochemical expression levels showed a highly significant increase at 7 days, 14 days and 21 days, respectively ( P <0.001) ( Table 2 ).
Excerpts
There was a marked trend by a graphical representation that serum neuritin levels were increased in the order of the scores from 0 to 6 ( p < 0.001; Supplementary Figure S6B ).
Two of these nine proteins, NES and SOD1, showed a highly significant differential expression (p < 0.001) in four out of five amniocyte pairs (Table 3 ).
Whereas, BAFF serum levels (p = 0.06; wilks-lambda = 0.907) showed a statistical trend and CRP (p<0.001; wilks-lambda = 0.549) a significant difference at admission between patients with severe course (sNPoD) as compared to patients developing less severe disease (NP or EP).
Sensitivity analysis excluding women with cervical dilatation > 6 cm n = 270) showed similar, highly significant associations between the total score of the GebStart-tool and all intervals describing care needs (p < 0.001 for all associations).
This stark contrast between island and mainland regions is highly significant for RRN (Mann–Whitney U test: P < 0.001), and even more so for RRI ( Fig. 1B ).
Heart rate values were statistically highly significant lower in the labetalol group than magnesium sulfate group starting from intubation until 110 min after anesthesia induction ( p < 0.001), and both groups were comparable at baseline values ( p > 0.05) (Fig. 2 B).
When the variable exposure to violence at home was analyzed singularly in a simple logistic regression, the prediction was highly significant ( p = .001), but when the other factors were taken into account (see Table 3 ), exposure to violence was no longer a significant predictor.
Proliferation following stimulation with either LPS or Con A was reduced to a highly significant extent (p < 0.001) in mice treated with either 1 mg/week or 5 mg/week of anti-IL-6 antibody compared to control.
The difference (11%) between tests 1 and 3 was highly significant (P < 0.001).
A significant decrease was observed within 6 hr with the lowest F − dose tested (0.125 mM F − ; p < 0.01) and became highly significant ( p < 0.001) for each of the F − concentrations > 0.125 mM.
In contrast, there was a highly significant 21.1% difference between mean (±SD) TM-VO 2pred and HRI-VO 2 (8.12±1.85 METs and 6.71±1.92, respectively; p<0.001).
For all analyses, p value < 0.05 was considered significant (*), representing p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), and p < 0.001/ p < 0.0001 as extremely significant (***/****). 5.
There was a highly significant interaction between microalgae dose and measurement time (p < 0.001).
Examination of factorial structure of the D-RECT using confirmatory factor analysis resulted in an unsatisfactory model-fit with a highly significant chi-square value of 2383,576 (p<0.001).
Comparing scores from the two radiologists, highly significant positive correlations were observed (r>0.90 and p<0.001, Pearson correlation test, figure 2A, B ).
The highly significant difference occurs in the surface soil (p<0.001), with the range of changes under drip irrigation being smaller than that under flood irrigation.
The higher dose (TQ, 10 mg/kg) produced a highly significant ( p < 0.001) reversal in the number of flinches and duration of paw licking behavior in both the acute and delayed phase of the formalin test.
A detailed association check between program levels and Bloom’s taxonomy levels for correct answers by ChatGPT-4 showed a highly significant correlation (p<0.001), reflecting a concentration of “remember-level” questions in preclinical and “evaluate-level” questions in clinical courses.
The season was found to play a very highly significant role in number of attendances at clinic (p<0.001), with higher patient numbers in the summer months.
Similarly, there was a highly significant difference in the time until the next fever spike (F (2,131)=15.66, p<0.001).
Using moderate harm as the outcome, the model on the QLS sample was highly significant before the addition of exceeding the low-risk gambling limits as a predictor (χ 2 = 118.59; p < .001).
Although the overall number of significant tests between clusters at each follow-up remained stable at each follow-up, the number of highly significant pairwise statistical test (i.e., p < 0.001) decreased from 60.0 to 36.7%.
Figure 4 shows a highly significant difference between sites ( p ≤ 0.001).
The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.99 for all lower limb segments ( figure 4A left), and were all highly significant (p<0.001).