As for the direct effect of sex on decomposition use, it was highly significant before the mediator was entered in the model ( p < .001); once the mediator was added, the direct effect decreased but remained significant ( p = .02), indicating partial mediation (see Figure 1 A).
Excerpts
The AUROC curve was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for quadruple (AUROC, 0.966; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.940-0.991) and triple tests (AUROC, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.927-0.983).
Particularly, footprint length (F6), footprint width (F7), and heel-to-toe distances (F1–F5) exhibited highly significant sex-based differences ( p < 0.001).
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin analysis yielded a high index of 0.941 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 (136) = 8,313, P < 0.001), indicating suitability for factor analysis.
The corrected R 2 = 0.019 was small but highly significant ( p < 0.001).
SaO 2 levels increased immediately, at 5 min, and at 10 min postsuctioning compared to presuctioning in both groups; however, a decline was observed at 10 min postsuctioning, showing a highly significant difference ( p < .001).
The difference between the means for level of compliance and how essential respondents felt the standard to be was highly significant ( t( 47 ) = p < .001).
But, those voxels surviving significance thresholding at p < 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons with a spatial extent threshold of k = 20 voxels, are also reported in the Section “ Results .” Results Forced choice classification The logistic slope value of the fitted regression curve of each individual continuum was highly significant at p > 0.001.
To confirm the previously obtained values, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was first conducted ( Table S3; Supplementary Materials ), with significance values less than 0.05 and showed highly significant differences across all treatments ( p < 0.001).
A one-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of language on this measure, F (2, 94) = 64.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.449.
Multivariate analysis for OS showed two highly significant factors associated with worse prognosis: extracapsular extension and N3 status (both P < 0.001).
Results The Lysholm score in all 33 individuals showed a highly significant increase from a preoperative median 49.0 points to a median 86.0 points ( P ≤ 0.001).
mansoni FECs were not considered as continuous, but stratified according to pre-set thresholds into no, light, moderate and heavy infection intensity, we found that for each increase in infection intensity category, the likelihood of a stronger color reaction of both CCA-A (OR = 36.5) and CCA-B (OR = 25.2) is highly significant (both p<0.001).
The nonparametric Mann-Whitney test for equal median levels demonstrated highly significant (P < 0.001) differences for both pollutants.
Pooled effects of MD data sets revealed that the ASD group showed a considerably significant MD increase in bilateral IFOF (left: SMD = 0.71, 95% CI 0.36 ~ 1.05, p < 0.001; right: SMD = 0.68, 95% CI 0.34 ~ 1.03, p < 0.001).
Results: Subjects with admission categories of MFAC 2 and 3 had a highly significant ( p < 0 . 001 ) MRMI gain (6.2 and 6.6, respectively) and subjects with admission categories of MFAC 3 to 5 had highly significant ( P < 0 . 001 ) MRMI efficiency (0.34, 0.40, and 0.39, respectively).
A logistic regression of this dataset, with presence or absence of a cilium as the dependent variable, and age, transgenic status, neuron size (ie >20 μm), and sex as predictive variables, shows that presence of a mutant transgene is a highly significant predictor of reduced ciliation (p < 0.001), as is large neuron size (p < 0.001).
7.1%, p = 0.40), with a highly significant decrease in bleeding (2.4 vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001; Lincoff et al., 2003 ).
Moreover, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference in overall survival between high and low ACSL5 expression groups (p = 0.013), while PRDX1 showed even stronger prognostic value, with an inverse survival trend and highly significant difference (p < 0.001) ( Figures 7J, K ).
Gray’s test revealed prior PJI as a highly significant risk factor for re-infection ( p = 0.001).
4C becoming highly significant (both increasing vs increasing-decreasing p = 0.001; both increasing vs other p = 0.013; both decreasing vs increasing-decreasing p < 0.001; both decreasing vs other p < 0.001; LME post-hoc tests, Tukey correction), as well as the difference between increasing-decreasing and other pairs becoming significant ( p = 0.040).
Sushruta and Charaka contributed separate chapter on Arsha and included in the list of grave disease.[ 7 , 8 ] After AKA, bleeding per rectum stopped completely in second week while after SCL, bleeding per rectum completely stopped in 3 rd week [ Table 2 ], which was highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].
All pairwise F st values were highly significant ( p < 0.001), ranging from 0.009 (between FJDYS and FJFHS) to 0.234 (between V‐HB and ZJJD; Table 5 ).
The expected and observed proportions of affected offsprings by birth rank differ substantially (top left) and the χ 2 -type test is highly significant (p<0.001).
The value of the Student t test was highly significant in all three cases (p<0.001).