Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation analysis ( Figure 2 ) further substantiated these findings, showing that Bitterness and Astringency scores were positively correlated with these monomeric catechins, particularly EGCG and ECG ( p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), while Sweetness scores exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with most catechins and THEO ( p < 0.001).
highly significantP value = 0.00100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On further analysis, statistically significant correlations were observed among the different periodontal parameters studied with the age and gender of the subjects and the predicted tobacco/nicotine dependence which included potential correlations among age and PPD ( P value = 0.0420), age and CAL ( P value = 0.0040), gender and GI ( P value = 0.0320), gender and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0210), GI and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0240), GI and PPD ( P value = 0.0180), and GI and CAL ( P value = 0.0050), while the results were found to be statistically highly significant in case of the correlations derived between OHI-S and CAL ( P value = 0.0010) and PPD and CAL ( P value = 0.0001) with several clinical implications of interest.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Genetic knockdown of three genes ( Ca-Beta , Sur , and sei ), in AKH producing cells caused highly significant changes ( P < 0.001) in both male and female lifespan, and knockdown of six other genes ( Shaw , cac , Ih , NaCP60E , stj , and TASK6 ) caused significant changes ( P < 0.05) in only female lifespan.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All the three preloading fluids, including Ringer’s Lactate used as control, were seen to significantly increase the capillary blood glucose levels intra-operatively ( P < 0.05), but the rise with Dextran-40 was seen to be sustained and highly significant ( P < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All participants got adapted, although to a variable extent ( Figure 2B ), as also confirmed by the two-way ANOVA which showed a highly significant main effect of Adaptation [ F (1, 15) = 45.818; p < 0.001; ƞ p 2 = 0.75] and Adaptation x Numerosity [ F (4, 60) = 9.667; p = 0.001; ƞ p 2 = 0.39].