Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

an obvious trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Based on the different expression levels of NR4A1 identified by Western blot in the AMI heart of C57BL/6 CX3CR1-/- mice after MSC transfusion (NR4A1/GAPDH ≥ 0.2), we first found an obvious trend of myocardial fiber lysis and decrease in low-level NR4A1 group through Masson staining at day 3 after AMI (36% ± 7.5% vs. 50% ± 11%, p < 0.001) ( Figure 4(a) ), though there is no significant difference concerning thickness of the left ventricular wall at the time (data not shown).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At the trait level, measurements of FNE and PSOC were stable; the standardized estimates for FNE ranged from 0.85 to 0.86 and for PSOC from 0.69 to 0.75, all highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting the validity of applying the RI-CLPM model.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Straw return and P application had significant ( P < 0.01) or highly significant ( P < 0.001) effects on the total P (TP) content in each soil layer at each stage, and significant effects on the Olsen-P (OP) content in S1 soil layer ( P < 0.05), however, the OP content in S2 soil layer was only affected by the application of P application ( Figures 6 , 7 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding the duration of mechanical ventilation as an outcome, patients with VAP had a mean of 12.16 days (SD: 4.64) and a median of 10.50 days (IQR: 9.00-16.00), while non-VAP patients had a mean of 4.88 days (SD: 1.37) and a median of 5.00 days (IQR: 4.00-6.00); this difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy had higher levels of systolic pressure (daytime, night-time, and 24-hour) that were statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) and significantly higher diastolic daytime and night-time pressure readings (p < 0.05) than patients without left ventricular hypertrophy.
a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Temporal analysis of genome size (2000–2025) revealed an overall positive correlation (ρ = 0.17, p < 0.001, n = 1,067), with complete genomes showing stronger correlation (ρ = 0.223, p < 0.001, n = 45) while contig-level assemblies exhibited a negative trend (ρ = −0.214, p < 0.001, n = 776), likely reflecting assembly fragmentation artifacts.