Excerpts

The findings revealed a strong and highly significant intervention effect, t (559) = −78.51, p < .001, suggesting that treatment condition accounted for a substantial proportion of the variance in post-intervention outcomes.

The difference among the median [−2]proPSA repeated measures was highly significant at the Friedman test ( p < 0.001); all the differences between adjacent time-points were extremely significant ( p < 0.001), when investigated by the Wilcoxon test.

Both differences were highly significant (attitudinal differential F 1,252 =41.151, P <.001; trust differential F 1,252 =134.656, P <.001).

The differences among embryo genotypes for seed weight and young plant weight were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

In the depression model for females, age and income were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).

aeruginosa early biofilm at 470 μF capacitance at 4°C and 25°C and at three different irradiation frequencies of 540, 720, and 900 was highly significant compared to the control, with a bactericidal rate of >80% ( p < 0.001).

This relationship was confirmed by a Simple Slopes Analysis, which revealed highly significant negative effects (t‐value < −37.9; p < 0.001; Table 3 ; Figure 3 ).

In contrast, a highly significant number of participants (18/20) favored complex strokes for their whole system gestures (two-tailed exact binomial test, p < 0.001).

The differences in DM disappearance were highly significant ( p < 0.001) between dietary treatments from day 10–18 where it was higher in the LCF litters.

• ∗ indicates p < 0.05 (significant) • ∗∗ indicates p < 0.01 (highly significant) • ∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.001 (very highly significant) • ∗∗∗∗ indicates p < 0.0001 (extremely highly significant) • ns indicates p ≥ 0.05 (not significant) For the p-value test, a smaller value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting a more significant difference between the methods.

As expected, there’s a highly significant difference in weight across categories ( F = 107.758, P < .001).

A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the effects of genotypes were highly significant ( P < 0.001) among most of the phenotypic traits, except root average diameter (RAD) showed a weak significant difference ( P < 0.05) (Table 1 ).

Statistically significant changes were classified as significant ( ∗ ) where p < 0.05, more significant ( ∗∗ ) where p < 0.01, and highly significant ( ∗∗∗ ) where p < 0.001 as compared with control group. 3.

Similarly, preoperative CT imaging findings showed a trend towards a strong correlation ( r = 0.705, p < 0.001) and an ICC indicating good average agreement (ICC = 0.835, p < 0.001).

One effect from each study is highly significant ( p = .001) and the other two effects are closer to the p < .05 criterion: p = .025 and p = .049.

The data demonstrated excellent suitability for factor extraction, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy at 0.872 and a highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.001).

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.989 and was quite significant at p<0.001.

The effect is highly significant ( t (114) = 8.786, p < 0.001, d = 0.508 (medium effect size), 95% CI for d (0.387, 0.629); single sample t -test, one-sided). 3.5.

There were highly significant correlations between HOMA-IR and insulin in both diabetic patients (R = 0.961, P = 0.001) and control subjects (R = 0.975, P = 0.001) ( Table 1 ).

Covirs-bIOP was markedly higher in the OHT group (22.25 ± 5.63 mmHg) compared to the control group (15.88 ± 2.08 mmHg), with a highly significant difference (t = −6.186, p < 0.001), corresponding to a mean difference of + 6.37 mmHg (95% CI: 4.86 to 7.88) and a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.52).

When analyzed by gender, female rats in the diabetic group demonstrated statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in CDC42 expression relative to the control (Fig. 3 B).

There was a highly significant difference (P<0.001) in the mean salivary TNF-α levels between the two groups ( Table 3 ).

Poorly differentiated tumors occurred in significantly older patients, which was highly significant (p < 0.001).

After 3 months of treatment, the mean (SD) IELT in Group I showed a highly significant improvement from 37 (11.24) s to 120.5 (47.37) s ( P < 0.001) but Group II showed no significant improvement from baseline to [39.43 (13.6) s; P > 0.05].

The model was considered highly significant ( χ 2 ( 2 ) = 274.822 ; p < 0.001 ), although the effect size was small ( R M F 2 = 0.096 ; R N 2 = 0.132 ; R C S 2 = 0.129 ).