Excerpts

The effect of treatment group was highly significant (F (2, 80) = 43.25, p < 0.001).

We find a highly significant relationship between FA ratio of the CST and motor function (r = 0.56, p = 0.001).

As shown in Figure 4 the most evident association was with the neutrophils, showing a highly significant correlation between mCRP and cd66b+ neutrophils (Spearman correlation 0.57, p<0.001).

We observed a highly significant interaction between support for reintroduction and a lack of support for removal operations (χ 2 = 152.0, df = 2, P < 0.001).

Linear regression indicated that both PFOA concentration and culture time are highly significant predictors for both α and M ( p < 0.001 for all).

Without Geo) All paired t -tests were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that adding geolocation yields statistically detectable reductions in MSE on the per-fold evaluation vectors in Table 9 . 4.5.2.

Commodity type had a highly significant relationship with the odds of both AFB1 detection (p < 0.001) and illegal status (p < 0.001).

P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, P < 0.01 was highly significant, and P < 0.001 was extremely significant.

Our results presented in Table 4 highlight that “practical situation” (set 3) provided highly significant results ( p < 0.001) and was by far the most important set of predictors for all four outcomes, explaining in addition to the first two sets 17%, 22%, 30%, and 49% of the total variance, respectively.

Statistical analysis Difference between groups was analyzed by applying the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test (P < 0.05 as significant, P < 0.01 as highly significant, P < 0.001 as very highly significant).

The analysis of the prognostic KM curve demonstrated a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in the survival outcomes of LUAD patients between the high- and low-risk score groups in the TCGA-LUAD dataset (Fig. 3 E).

Both models revealed a highly significant overall and nonlinear association between platelet levels and outcomes (overall P < 0.001; nonlinear P < 0.001). 4.

Tissue-specific expression differences were highly significant (one-way ANOVA: F (6,14) = 194.65, p < 0.001; Figure 2 B). 3.3.

Under salt stress conditions, a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in the Na + /K + ratio was observed in the leaves, with reduced levels in P. indica -colonized date palms ( Figure 3A ).

Bacteriological analysis showed a highly significant difference between the triple therapy group and others ( P ≤ 0.001) as shown in Fig. 5 , where 4-log 10 reductions were recorded compared to the results for the most active single drug, indicating synergy according to the definition.

rosea on egg mortality ANOVA showed that spore concentration had a highly significant effect on egg mortality ( p < 0.001), with mortality increasing at higher concentrations of both fungal species ( Table 3 ).

globosa essential oil did not elicit a significant choice at the lowest tested dose of 0.01 mg ( p = 0.958), but all other tested doses had a highly significant repellent effect on T. confusum ( p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001 for 0.1 mg, 1 mg and 5 mg, respectively) ( Figure 1 ). 2.3.

A positive trend in PBT use over time was observed with 2.8% of cases being treated in 2008 compared to 21.5% in 2014 ( P = .001).

The minimum eccentricity of eyes-in-head at the start of a new saccade varies with posture, for sit M = 17.8°, for swivel M = 17.4°, and for stand M = 16.5°, a highly significant effect, F (2, 84886) = 192.9, p < .001, η G 2 = 0 . 0 0 5 , with significant pairwise differences between postures (all p ’s < .001).

Age and the Charlson co-morbidity index are independent and highly significant ( p < 0.001) predictors for mortality [ 7 ].

In contrast, stage B HF patients exhibited a highly significant increase in MMP3 staining score compared to controls ( p < 0.001).

On unadjusted analysis, unplanned pregnancy showed a very strong association with anxiety (OR = 26.5; 95% CI: 7.7-91.4), which remained highly significant after adjustment (adjusted OR = 9.8; 95% CI: 2.9-33.1; p < 0.001).

The results were considered significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).

Additionally, there was a highly significant difference between the patient and control groups in terms of HOMA values ( p < 0.001, 2.87 ±2.56 vs. 1.63 ±0.65).

Restricting analysis to only those who became pregnant, an additional Kaplan–Meier curve for TTP showed a trend of a longer, but less obvious, TTP among adolescent newlyweds with a thinner than larger preconceptional MUAC ( p = .001; Figure 3 ).