Results Behavioral data A highly significant main effect for time was found (F (1, 8) = 33.091, p ≤ 0.001), resulting from an overall reduction of tinnitus intensity post-stimulation, regardless of the stimulation.
Excerpts
A highly significant effect of time on feed intake (df = 8; F = 30.27, p < 0.001) as well as a significant group vs. week interaction (df = 48; F = 8.27, p < 0.001) were also observed, which indicates that temporal variations in feed intake differed between groups.
1B ), using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test: in both cases the difference is highly significant ( P<0.001 ).
Samples for which the statistical tests showed a highly significant result ( P < 0.001) were eliminated from the data set.
Spearman correlations among journal-level bibliometric indicators were uniformly strong and highly significant (Table 6 and Figure 4 ): JIF correlated almost perfectly with CiteScore (ρ = +0.84; 95% CI +0.77 to +0.89; p < 0.001), and inter-metric correlations among CiteScore, SJR, and SNIP exceeded ρ = +0.88 (all p < 0.001).
This latter finding reflects the highly significant partial correlation between age 11 MHT score and later life Raven score, controlling for cohort (r = 0.52, df = 892, p < 0.001).
In all genotypes, the linear regression between both water indicators was highly significant ( p < 0.001), but not very strong (r 2 ranging from 0.61 to 0.80) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
We found a strong and highly significant correlation between UCPs and plasma C-peptides for DPZ animals (r s = 0.845, p<0.001, Figure 1e ), but not CS animals (r s = 0.390, p = 0.093, Figure 1f ).
Anti-TPO antibody positivity was markedly higher in the SCH group (46.3%) than in the euthyroid group (13.9%), and this association was highly significant (p<0.001).
In the 80 mg/kg group, the tumor volume was 671.82 ± 435.43 mm3, and the relative tumor proliferation rate was 58.03%, showing a highly significant statistical difference compared to the model control group ( P < 0.001).
The p < 0.05 level was assumed as a statistically significant relationship (*); p < 0.01 is a highly significant relationship (**); p < 0.001 is a very highly statistically significant relationship (***).
The PLSR analysis revealed that sex had a highly significant effect on facial form (R 2 = 0.2416, p < 0.001), after adjusting for age (R 2 = 0.0154) but not size.
The differences between the quartiles were highly significant as assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( P = 0.001).
With regard to the mean RV free wall LS at the baseline, the adult group (G2) had a highly significant lower level than the children and adolescent group (G1) ( P < 0.001, Table 5 ) with a significant reduction after 24 h in both groups (RV free wall LS: G1-Δ1 − 2.93 ± 0.92%, P = 0.003; G2-Δ1 − 2.50 ± 1.01%, P = 0.026).
Furthermore, a clear trend was observed between the intensity of 1110 cm −1 peaks and logarithmic concentrations of MP with R 2 ranging from 0.964 to 0.969 ( p < 0.001) ( Fig.
Post-diagnostic PA levels were associated with a significant trend ( P < 0.001) of decreased all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, which was stronger among older women (aged 50–74 years) and did not differ across categories of body mass index.
Analysis of variance ( Table 3 ) confirmed that all factors had highly significant effects on titer (p < 0.001).
Result Phenotypic assessment The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences among the genotypes effects, salinity treatments, and their interactions (genotype × treatment interaction (Gen × Trt)) for germination-related traits across the four NaCl treatment levels (0, 100, 150 and 200 mM).
We found that 159 (97%) aphantasics showed aphantasia-like imagery weakness in at least one other (non-visual) domain, compared to 15 controls (11%), which was highly significant ( χ 2 (1, N = 302) = 223.89, p < .001; using Yates correction).
We also identified an increasing trend in for IGRA positivity with increasing incarceration time (Cochran–Armitage test for trend, p < 0.001).
The whole plant analysis indicated that these differences in shikimate accumulation were already apparent 48 h after treatment and after 96 h, a highly significant ( p < 0.001, DF = 1, n = 10) 2.5-fold greater shikimate concentration was found in leaves of the SG biotype ( Figure 2A ).
The analysis revealed a highly significant effect of the algorithmic factor on classification performance (F (12, 377) = 417.01, p < 0.001), indicating that variations in G-mean across models were not due to random chance.
The model was highly significant (GLM, P < 0.001), explaining 26%, 34% and 86% of the variance for latitude, longitude and depth, respectively (Suppl.
Extremely significant differences were detected ( P < 0.001).
Enormously significant (p<0.001) difference in breaking strength was observed in all groups treated with 5% (w/w), 10% (w/w) latex, and 0.2% w/v nitrofurazone ointment. 3.5.