This was further confirmed through a highly significant interaction term ( p < 0.001 ) in a linear model of log(WMH load), adjusted for head size and total CVR burden ( R a 2 = 0.26 , Table 2 ).
Excerpts
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were determined in concentration, type of solvent, and extraction time regarding Ae. aegypti mortality for the two species.
Histomorphometry revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the germinal epithelium thickness between the breeding and non-breeding seasons.
The introduction of alloxan drastically increased the blood glucose level, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the normal control group, and remained constant throughout the study period.
Broad sense heritability estimated was 0.53, with highly significant genotypic variance ( P value ≤ 0.001).
En bloc samples showed a statistically highly significant negative relationship ( p < 0.001) between age and number of tubular cross sections, meaning that as expected, the outer/inner tubular diameter and thickness of the tubular wall of seminiferous tubules enlarged with increasing age (each p < 0.001), resulting in fewer tubular cross sections per visual field.
The difference between the most disliked and the third disliked politician ( Mdn = 2) was highly significant as well, Z = − 6.20, p < 0.001.
Results Preliminary analyses An initial examination of the ANS task revealed similar accuracy scores across the four blocks (Block 1: M = .77, SD = .07; Block 2: M = .69, SD = .07; Block 3: M = .77, SD = .06; Block 4: M = .73, SD = .08) and highly significant intercorrelations (Block 1 and Block 2: r = .39, p < .001; Block 1 and Block 3: r = .42, p < .001; Block 1 and Block 4: r = .38, p < .001; Block 2 and Block 3: r = .36, p = .001; Block 2 and Block 4: r = .49, p < .001; Block 3 and Block 4: r = .55, p < .001).
General linear model testing of the change values revealed a highly significant difference between the groups ( p <0.001, t -test for paired groups).
Multivariate analysis for OS showed two highly significant factors associated with worse prognosis: extracapsular extension and N3 status (both P < 0.001).
We found highly significant differences ( p <0.001) among several categories of nonconveyed cases and on-scene time intervals among EMS centers.
Indeed, only these 3 variables, and comprehension, remained highly significant (all P < 0.001, except for subjective norm, P = 0.009).
The distribution of underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity by geographic area (urban, rural, indigenous regions), as estimated by the surveys ENV II 2003, ENV III 2008 and PREFREC – 2010, is presented in Figure 5 , and in all areas it had an increasing trend (p<0.001).
This analysis revealed a highly significant effect of cue type on naming accuracy (β = 2.894, SE = 0.141, z = 20.48, p < 0.001).
The obtained CV-ANOVA results demonstrated a highly significant model performance with an F-value of 267.637 and an extremely low p-value (P < 0.001).
Asterisks denote highly significant differences (TukeyHSD test, p<0.001).
However, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was noted at a dose of 400 μM CoCl 2 .
This effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001) from 6th day onward in comparison with the control group (simple ointment).
A two-way ANOVA of the histamine concentrations resulted in a statistically highly significant difference between mice with impaired and normal kidney function ( F (4, 44) = 23.2, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4 b).
A highly significant correlation existed between the microarray and realtime RT-PCR results (r = 0.97, p value < 0.001) (Figure 6 ), thus demonstrating the reliability of our gene expression measurements.
TG showed a significant negative correlation with HDL-C (P < 0.01), while a highly significant positive correlation was observed with VLDL-C (P < 0.001).
The difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The ANOVA revealed highly significant individual differences ( p < 0.001) among the items explored by each animal, with partial eta squared ( η 2 p ) values ranging from 0.360 to 0.442, indicating large effect sizes ( η 2 p > 0.14).
Interestingly, in contrast with that observed with the local and peripheral IFN-γ responses, IgA levels showed a positive and highly significant correlation (correlation coefficient: 0.68, p < 0.001), with the specific-IgG levels in serum by the endpoint of the experiment and to a lesser extent with the peripheral cellular immune response, measured with the IGRA test (correlation coefficient: 0.55, p < 0.01) ( Figure 10D ). 4.
1 D), and the association between EAC incidence and HDI indicated a weak trend toward increasing incidence rates with higher HDI levels ( ρ = 0.37, P < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 1B).