The difference in the proportion of agreement between pedodontists and nonpedodontists was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
Similarly, there was a larger, highly significant correlation between the number of ratings reported in the Google Play and Apple App Stores ( r =0.87; P <.001; 116/154, 75.3%), which, in turn, was significantly correlated with the number of installs (Google Play ratings: r =0.96; P <.001; 150/154, 97.4%; Apple App Store ratings: r =0.90; P <.001; 120/154, 77.9%).
However, the differences in the INR, aPTT and PT between the control group and test group were highly significant, i.e., p < 0.001.
There were also striking and highly significant differences in the share of participants displaying inertia in the control condition (proportion test, p <0.001): only 12.5 % (SD = 0.33) of students never switched, compared to 45.7 % (SD = 0.50) of non-students ( Fig. 4 ).
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) value of 0.870, in conjunction with a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity (χ 2 = 5493.945, df = 1225, p < 0.001), demonstrates substantial intercorrelation among the variables, thereby confirming the appropriateness for PCA.
With both interventions, we observed highly significant ( P < 0.001) improvements with large effect sizes (>0.8) for symptoms and condition-specific quality of life (QoL) after 1 and 2 years, respectively.
Furthermore, the result was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The decrease in intrafollicular 17beta-estradiol concentration after the LH surge was highly significant (p < 0.001).
From an ecological perspective, there are highly significant worsening trends in ecological overshoot across nine out of ten indicators with available time-series data ( P < 0.001), ranging from 0.3%pt per year (forest conversion) to more than 80%pt per year (hazardous chemicals; Table 2 and Extended Data Fig. 6 ).
The likelihood ratio comparison between the last-two bifactor models is highly significant (Δ χ 2 [1] = 1340.61 , p < . 001), suggesting that QoL’s residual dependence is adequately modeled by the simpler bifactor’s specification of CASP item-content subdomains.
Mean± SE: native = 0.35 ± 0.23; mean introduced = −0.30 ± 0.24) and a highly significant treatment effect (F 2,119= 93.32, p < 0.001).
The difference was found to be highly significant statistically (p = 0.001).
aureus showed higher susceptibility to azithromycin (40.00 ± 0.82 mm) and ciprofloxacin (34.33 ± 0.94 mm) compared to the extracts, which demonstrated a maximum ZOI of 15 mm. Cytotoxic Activity The EASF and DCMSF fractions revealed the lowest LC 50 values at 1.11 and 1.21 μg/mL, respectively, in comparison to the standard of 0.451 μg/mL, the AQSF and PESF fractions displayed moderate cytotoxic activity with LC 50 values of 25.47 and 15.52 μg/mL, respectively ( Figure 5 ). Analgesic Activity Figure 6 illustrated that highly significant (p< 0.001) analgesic activity was observed from most of the fractions of leaves of C. indica , while EASF showed very significant (p< 0.01).
Pairwise Nemenyi post hoc test for multiple comparisons showed no difference between the natural articulation-plus-translation condition and the only-articulation condition, p = 0.840, but highly significant differences between all other conditions, p < 0.001.
Biochemical analysis ( Table-1 ) One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in the serum level of the studied parameters in the different animal groups (p<0.001).
It can be seen from the ANOVA table that the effect of sample, i.e., help-seeking versus non-help-seeking, is highly significant [ F (1, 2, 308) = 248, p < 0.001] as one would expect.
Predictors that were selected consistently [at least weakly significant ( p < 0.05) in two out of three selection processes and at least highly significant ( p < 0.001) in one] were used for consecutive analyses.
A permutation test (10,000 times) was performed to determine the LOD thresholds for significant ( p < 0.05) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) QTLs.
The differences in the mean number of SCEs per cell between the control and all test variants (solution, dose, and time) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
6B that the fluorescence intensity in the SMMC-7721 cells (155.66 ± 7.06) and HepG2 cells (41.58 ± 3.19) was higher than that of L02 cells (0.001 ± 0.0) incubated with FA-PEG-QDs for 2 h and there was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in fluorescence intensity between L02 cells and the hepatocarcinoma cells (HepG2 and SMMC-7721), confirming that FA-PEG-QDs can target more easily cancer cells than normal cells.
The cubic spline fit of pterin relative fluorescence was highly significant for both female and male flies (Females: F 9 = 24.58, p < 0.001, with the fit explaining 49.5% of the variance; Males: F 9 = 10.87, p < 0.001, with the fit explaining 43.3% of the variance) indicating a strong seasonal effect.
Model A in Table 3 shows highly significant ORs that generally increased from intact to maternal, paternal and no-parent families (p < 0.001 for trend).
When comparing local and regional recurrence by site, there was a highly significant difference in tumor recurrence (Log rank test, P = 0.001 and P = 0.032, respectively).
A highly significant L × W interaction was observed ( p < 0.001), indicating that the magnitude of the effect of wool content varies with fibre length (and vice versa).
There was a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.98, P <0.001) and the slope of the line was 1.05 within the range from 0.3 to 70ngml-'.