Excerpts

The results were highly significant (p < 0.005).

Notably, the inhibitory effect of NaAc was highly significant at 42 and 45 dpi ( p < 0.005) ( Figure 7 A).

This variable showed a highly significant, positive correlation with performance on the generalisation task for the entire body of participants ( r = 0.49, p = 0.005).

Highly significant (4.26-fold, P ≤0.005) reduction in tumor volume was observed using an in vivo mouse xenograft colon cancer model.

All phases of the sexual res- ponse cycle were affected and all the differences between premorbid and post treatment ratings were highly significant (P<0.005).

The mean LEQUESNE index scoring had significant differences, with the P-value being highly significant (P < 0.005) for the 1st month, 3rd month, and during 6th months (P < 0.005).

Stratification of the training set into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups for CD4 and CD1a populations was highly significant as displayed in KM curves of DFS ( p = 0.005 and p = 0.007, respectively) ( Figure 2 A; Table 4 ).

Surprisingly, despite notable segregation of blank- and 11KT-implanted silver females by MDS, target gene expression in muscle changed little between both groups; only relative ara expression was different between both experimental groups, and although highly significant ( F 1,10 = 13.098, P = 0.005), fold-change was modest ( ara mRNA levels in 11KT-treated eels were 74% those of controls).

This difference was highly significant (P = 0.005).

There was a near-significant trend for think–pair–share ( p = 0.005).

We identified 1261 probe set with highly significant expression differences between controls and experimental mice (p < 0.005, no multiple test correction). 496 had lower expression in T2D compared to non-diabetic mice, while 765 genes had higher expression in T2D.

The number of nephrons per kidney of surviving Osr1 +/- Wt1 +/- mice that had two kidneys was about 72% of that of their control littermates at P21, with the differences between these groups being highly significant (p < 0.005) ( Fig 3G ).

The Cyco group exhibited a highly significant increase in LDH levels from Day 1 to Day 3 (t-statistic = −7.48, p -value = 0.005).

G2 had nominally significant overrepresentation of genes attributed to CD8 + T cells ( P = 0.005), central memory T cells ( P = 0.02), Th2 cells ( P = 0.05), and eosinophils ( P = 0.03) ( Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure 4 ).

There was a highly significant ( p < 0.005) LPS-induced secretion of IFNγ, IL1β, and TNFα in culture supernatants from AM isolated from pigs fed mushrooms ( Table S2 ), but other cytokines were below the limit of detection of the assay (data not shown).

Exploratory statistical analysis suggests that this negative effect may be significant when compared to the control arm ( p = 0.005 in IA2-Scented and p = 0.018 in IA3-Mirror).

A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 was considered moderately significant, and p < 0.005 was considered highly significant.

This clinical response was reflected in a highly significant difference ( P = 0.005) in the mean percentage reduction in PASI score for patients treated with calcitriol plus UVB (65%) compared with those receiving phototherapy alone (43%).

Results NOEE produced highly significant ( P < 0.005 ) and significant ( P < 0.05 ) zones of inhibition at 30 mg/mL and 20 mg/mL respectively against most of the tested bacterial strains.

Although the amounts of CT released from the two bacteria dropped sharply while compared to that retained in the cell extracts, nevertheless 2.23 fold differences between the CT levels measured in vitro remained extremely significant ( P value <0.005).

Results 8/92 (8.6%) highly significant ( p < 0.005) discriminatory textural features between PDAC and PNEN were identified including the 1st order features “median,” “total energy,” “energy,” “10th percentile,” “90th percentile,” “minimum,” “maximum,” and the 2nd order feature “Gray-Level co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) Informational Measure of Correlation (Imc2).” In PNEN, the higher order feature “GLSZM Small Area High Gray-Level Emphasis” proved significantly higher in G1 compared to G2/3 tumors ( p < 0.05).

Strikingly, the difference in the ts/tv ratios were highly significant (p-value < 0.005) ( Fig. 1D ).

Centroid estimates drifted exponentially towards higher values ( Fig 5E ) matching closely the estimated modulation content of the stimulus (indicated by orange shading, see Materials and Methods and S5 Fig ), and this effect was surprisingly robust across listeners: even though drift (see Materials and Methods for definition) returned a noisy measurement for individual listeners (see 95% confidence intervals in Fig 5F ), it was consistently positive (symbols fall to the right of vertical line in Fig 5F ) so that the overall trend across listeners was highly significant (p<0.005).

However, there was a markedly significant correlation between age and TE concentration (CC 0.324, p = 0.005) via Pearson Product Moment Correlation. 3.3.

[ 9 ] was also highly significant in our cohort—miR-1180 ( p = 0.005).