An increasing trend in shared Bacteroides ASVs was observed comparing older vs. younger children (with maternal fecal microbiota: p < 0.01 in the RESONANCE cohort, p > 0.05 in the VDAART cohort; with maternal vaginal microbiota: p > 0.05 in the WISC cohort; Figures S10 A0 and B0).
Excerpts
papyrifera had extremely significant effects on the monthly average height of plantlets ( p < 0.01), while the root segment length and diameter had significant effects on the absorbing root’s formation rate ( p < 0.05).
The co-solvent type and C/OS ratio factors were highly significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the surfactant type did not have a significant effect on the ORR ( p = 0.396).
In the early weaning group, 90% of the infants were formula-fed, in the appropriate weaning group it was only 50%, which was highly significant ( p < 0,01).
Effects of Rhizosphere Effect (Rhizosphere/Bulk) and Altitude on Soil Nutrients and Stoichiometric Characteristics As shown in Table 2 , rhizosphere effect had no significant effects on TK, AK and soil pH ( p > 0.05), but a significant effect on AP ( p < 0.05) and highly significant effects on other soil nutrients and stoichiometric ratios ( p < 0.01).
The level of statistical significance was set to a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).
One-way ANOVA shows a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the antiglycation analysis of cinnamon bark extract and nanosuspensions. 3.3 Alpha-amylase inhibition The results of the alpha-amylase inhibition of C. zeylanicum barks extract and nanosuspensions were showed in Table 1 .
Growth Relationship between Above-Ground and Underground Biomass of Glycyrrhiza uralensis under Water Stress Under different water stress treatments, there was an extremely significant correlation between the below-ground biomass (BGB) and the above-ground biomass (AGB) of Glycyrrhiza uralensis ( p < 0.01), and the allometric growth relationship was biased toward under-ground biomass accumulation ( Figure 2 ).
The survival rate showed extremely significant difference between the infected groups and the control group at the end of observation period ( P < 0.01).
Temperature in winter showed a negative significant trend over the years (estimate = -0.046, SD = 0.013, p < 0.001), while mean temperature in October had an increasing trend (estimate = 0.049, SD = 0.015, p < 0.01) ( Fig 4 ).
This differences between two groups were highly significant ( P < 0.01).
P -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (# or * P < 0.05) and P -value of less than 0.05 was considered extremely significant (# or ** P < 0.01).
Results Our results revealed a highly significant statistical rise in GDF-15 levels among studied chronic HCV patients with liver fibrosis when compared to the control group ( p < 0.01).
While the correlations of Cladosporium colony count with both daily or monthly relative humidity and rainfall were not significant, the monthly rainfall data showed a highly significant correlation ( p ≤ 0.01) with Alternaria colony counts.
When TS was used as the thickener, G* end was significantly lower than G* initial in almost all of the 3 min and 6 min processing groups ( p < 0.05), with highly significant differences in the sugar-containing acidic beverages (SD and OJ) ( p < 0.01).
A highly significant reduction in DO 2 I was found in the Prot-7h group as compared with the control group (p<0.01).
Specifically, the study observed a decreasing trend in RA volume index across the three groups: normal glucose metabolism, prediabetes, and T2DM (median values of 25.2, 22.1, and 21.7 mL/m 2 , respectively; P < 0.01).
Significant differences in statistic were accepted if p < 0.05, and highly significant differences in statistic were accepted if p < 0.01.
In this study, linear regression and correlation analysis indicates that soil fractal dimensions have a highly significant correlation with soil properties ( p <0.01).
A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant ( P < 0.05), and a P value of less than 0.01 was considered statistically highly significant ( P < 0.01).
Differences in expression were considered significant ( * ) when P < 0.05 and highly significant ( ** ) when P < 0.01.
There were significant differences between all three groups in the presence of “shortness of breath” (p<0.01), though the difference between the negative and positive groups was barely significant (p<0.01).
Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the two variables that conform to the normality and used the following marks: one asterisk (*) indicated a significant difference ( p < 0.05), and two asterisks (**) indicated an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).
Results: Serum levels of 25 (OH) vitamin D recorded a highly significant difference between the studies groups (20,76±6,31 ng/ml in group I vs. 24,37±9,05ng/ml in group II vs. 24,57±6,45ng/ml in group III, p<0,01).
In conclusion, the anthropometric results showed highly significant differences in joint mobility in all dimensions in the elderly group compared to the adult group (p < 0.01).