The results were considered significant at p < 0.05, highly significant at p < 0.01, and not significant at p > 0.05. 3.
Excerpts
3 Results 3.1 Performance of wheat genotypes under salt stress conditions Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed highly significant ( P < .01) effect of genotypes (G) on all tested agronomic traits and a significant effect ( P < .05) on LA ( Table 2 ).
A highly significant z-score (z > 3.09, p < 0.01) indicates more non-synonymous substitutions than assumed under the neutral model, and only amino acid changes with a score between 6 and 8 and with a positive z-score < 0.001 were considered 94 .
Evaluation of scar by the clinician using Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale The difference of SBSES score between 15 th day to 6 months was highly significant ( P < 0.01) for Group 1.
Conversely, in the population of patients with sperm abnormality, we found a significant trend increase from day 1 to day 7 of TSC (16.38 vs. 56.0; p<0.01), sperm concentration (million/ml) (8.0 vs. 18.0; p<0.01) and morphology (3.0 vs. 5.0; p<0.01).
**** (p < 0.0001), *** (p < 0.001) both represent a highly significant level, ** represents a high significance level (p < 0.01) and * represents a significant level (p < 0.05) compared with the DEN control group.
In any case, the patterns measured by US and histology were similar, with a correlation (r = 0.918) highly significant ( p < 0.01) [ 7 ].
Data were considered significant at p < 0.05 ( * ) and highly significant at p < 0.01 ( ** ).
No differences were statistically significant for the characteristics of menopause and the BMR The skeletal muscle mass index and regional SLMI (arms, legs and trunk) showed an increasing trend of average values of VO 2max , reporting significant differences (p <0.01) between groups LOW-HIGH and MODERATE-HIGH, more marked for the SMI (−3.74% and −2.57%, respectively) and SLMIT (−2.56% and −1.78%).
The results showed that the instrumental variables—feel anxious and days suffered depression—were highly significant ( p < 0.01), implying a positive association with the two indicators of compliance with preventive behaviours.
The significance levels of each test are reported as significant for p<0.05 (*), as highly significant for p<0.01 (**) and as extremely significant for p<0.001 (***).
While cytokine pathway signal differs by treatment, all tested prioritized candidates—except RGS14 —show nominally significant ( t test, P < 0.01) signal in at least one treatment condition (Supplementary Fig. 9b ).
There was also a highly significant difference in the community structure of samples produced using extracted DNA or RNA ( p < 0.01). 3.3.2.
Statistical differences were designated significant if the p -values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant if the p -values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01), less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001), or less than 0.0001 (**** p ≤ 0.0001).
Mauchly’s Test of Sphericity was used, and in the multiple comparisons were used the Bonferroni post hoc test with significant changes at p < 0.05 and highly significant differences at p < 0.01.
The result of the combined analysis of variance revealed that there was highly significant variation (p < 0.01) of grain yield among the genotypes while the environments and genotype by environment interaction are found insignificant.
3.2 Effect of Sinigrin on Serum Hepatic Parameters The results depicted in Figure 2 revealed that there was a highly significant ( p < 0.01) increase in the serum concentrations of liver damage markers after exposure to DEN these include; ALT ( Figure 2 A), AST ( Figure 2 B), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ( Figure 2 C), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) ( Figure 2 D), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ( Figure 2 E), and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ( Figure 2 F).
The length parameters based on the length-length relationships of each sample were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Notably, the lung was extremely significant more expressed than the heart, liver, spleen and muscle ( P < 0.01), while spleen was also extremely significantly higher than muscle ( P < 0.01).
According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA), the combination effects of the carbonization temperature and NaOH post-treatment concentration on the mass yield and ash content were highly significant ( p < 0.01).
All six bioclimatic factors had extremely significant effects ( p < 0.01) on the distribution of venerable trees in Sichuan, with the exception of bio18.
We found a highly significant mortality rate of 89.47 ± 7.3% ( p < 0.01) on the 1st day and 98.14 ± 2.5% ( p < 0.01) on the 4th day in the DNA_pit group.
The P -values obtained from the statistical test of significance were generally significant at P < 0.05 , and highly significant at P < 0.01 .
This indicated that all observed P sex values for each MLG expansion were highly significant at the p <0.01 threshold, suggesting that all of the samples are clonal.
The occurrence area of the subsurface-reversed MHWs showed a rising trend of 1.27 × 10 14 m 2 yr −1 over 2001–2020, followed by the deep MHW, with an increasing trend of 7.38 × 10 13 m 2 yr −1 ( p < 0.01; Fig. 6a ).