Moreover, a highly significant positive correlation was identified between the concentration of soil AK and the abundance of Trichoderma and Apiosordaria ( p < 0.01, Figure 8 C,E).
Excerpts
aethiopicum is the most fronted side sauce on functions such as graduation parties and wedding ceremonies.” Male key informant—Mukono. Farmers’ genotype preferences Location, gender, and genotype effects There was a very highly significant difference between genotypes ( p < 0.01) for all parameter preferences, and location by genotype preferences ( p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).
The difference between every two time points was extremely significant ( P < 0.01) (Fig. 5 , Additional file 2 : Table S6), indicating that a large amount of GA was synthesized immediately after seed imbibition and the downstream signal transduction pathway was also stimulated to promote rapid seed germination.
The effects of Bacillales and Xanthomonadales on PD were highly significant (standardised regression coefficients of −0.782, p < 0.01 and −0.484, p < 0.05, respectively), whereas a significant coefficient for DSI was only found for Sphingomonadales (0.376 *).
The skew was also highly significant in the shared goal condition (skew = −1.31, SE = .43, z = −3.05, p <.01), therefore, we used non-parametric statistics to test the effect of our manipulations.
Statistical differences were stated as significant if the p -values were below 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) and were considered highly significant if the p -values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01) or even less than 0.001 (*** p ≤ 0.001).
Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and highly significant at p < 0.01.
Table 2 shows that for all morphological traits (GP, RL, SL, FW, and DW), there were highly significant differences between accessions, PEG concentrations, and interactions between them ( p ≤ 0.01), based on the ANOVA analysis performed on the data of 64 accessions reported in the supplementary file .
This correlation was also highly significant in each group separately (with and without ESPB; p < 0.01).
From 30% SC depth towards the skin surface, this ratio increases highly significant ( p < 0.01).
Statistic analysis The data analysis in this study was conducted by using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS software, and the difference between samples or treatments were considered-significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.
Significance of Effects from Analysis of Intervals For the analysis of health treatment cost by interval within lactation, the fixed effects of herd, interval, and the interaction of herd and interval were all highly significant ( p < 0.01) in first parity for each category of health treatment cost as well as TOT.
Results The results of ANOVA showed highly significant ( p < 0.01) effect of drought stress on all the studied traits (Table 1 ).
Correlation analysis between the genotype and citric acid content of the 57 sequenced accessions revealed a strong, highly significant correlation ( r = 0.812, P < 0.01).
Results Dispersal ability of alien plant species in six risk ranks Our results showed that there was a significant decreasing trend ( p < 0.05) in the natural dispersal ability, but an increasing trend ( p < 0.01) was observed in the anthropogenic dispersal ability for plants in ranks I to VI (Fig. 2 , Table 2 ).
We have found that there was an increasing trend in the number of performed thyroid ultrasounds (p=0.01).
The pathological scores showed that the difference between the treated group and the untreated group was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the difference between the ASC-secretome group and the DMEM group was significant ( p < 0.05).
Among these, 18 genera in the haemolymph and 12 in the gut displayed highly significant differences (Wilcoxon, p < 0.01; Figs. 6 B, 7 B).
By contrast, the positivity rate among those screened showed a negative trend (6.3% to 2.1%, p <.01).
Those with highly significant correlations P < 0.01 between the outcome measures of Group A are (1) right eye RNFL with the third-ventricle volume, (2) PSQI sleep quality with the right-lateral-ventricle, (3) left eye RNFL with left-cerebral white matter volume, (4) PSQI sleep quality with left-lateral-ventricle, (5) right eye RNFL with PSQI sleep latency, (6) PSQI sleep latency with left thalamus volume, (7) right-cerebral white matter volume with MS disease duration, (8) SF-36 pain with third-ventricle volume, (9) SF-36 (social functioning) with PSQI sleep quality, (10) PSQI sleep medications with MS disease duration.
Concerning the RPML, the difference in tumor size between the vehicle-treated and cetuximab-treated groups was highly significant, since the vehicle-treated group had twice the tumor volume of the cetuximab-treated group (1.12 ± 0.45 vs. 0.53 ± 0.16 ml; p < 0.01) (shown in Fig. 6 B).
However, duel success (%) and goal efficiency showed to be important as well and highly significant (dy/dx = 0.0214, p < 0.01, respectively, dy/dx = 0.0193, p < 0.01).
Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05 and to be highly significant at p < 0.01.
The 3 unit-level studies unsuitable for meta-analysis consistently supported these findings, all reporting highly significant, moderate to strong correlations of r = 0.65 (safety culture) and 0.56 (frequency of incident reporting; P < 0.01) 28 ; r = 0.69, 0.57, and 0.44 (safety culture at 3 time points; P < 0.001) 29 ; and β = 0.75 (safety culture; P < 0.001). 37 Engagement-as-State and Patient Safety Outcomes Four studies addressed this relationship, with 2 using mixed staff groups 30 , 34 and 2 using doctors only. 33 , 39 One was of fair 30 and the other 3 were of poor quality. 33 , 34 , 39 All were suitable for meta-analysis.
However, a 500 mg/kg dose produced highly significant results ( p < 0.01) by prominently increasing the weight and feed intake close to normal.