Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Only data meeting this normality assumption were subjected to further statistical analyses, including an ANOVA test, Duncan’s multiple comparison, and Pearson’s correlation analysis, with a significance level set at p < 0.05 and a highly significant level at p < 0.01.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
H-L agglomeration was mainly distributed in the counties surrounding Xining important townships and cultivated land areas, showing an extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01); this indicates that the high LU degree and the low ESV intensity in this area formed a spatial agglomeration ( Figure 9 b).
highly significantp<0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Result The fitted model of the analysis of variance of effect of fungal spores at different inoculum load of fungi spores on biochemical parameters in lungs of balb/c mice produced a highly significant (p<0.01) effect on all reactive oxygen species and antioxidant parameters except for hydrogen peroxide which showed no significant difference for both treatments and inoculum concentration.
highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The highly significant (P < 0.01) richness and Shannon diversity index values for samples from Western region forests could be attributed to the tropical nature of forests within this region such as sample K21 (Kakamega forest) which is considered an important biodiversity reservoir and the only remaining Guinea-Congolian tropical rain forest in Kenya 26 .
marginally significantp < 0.010.2× alphagold
Among those significant eQTL SNP-feature pairs that were well-imputed, polymorphic and expressed in the replication dataset (~84% of pairs, ~95% of eFeatures, see Methods , Figure S6 ), >94% had consistent directionality in the two datasets, between 75.7% (eTxns) and 81.5% (eJxns) were directionally consistent and marginally significant (at p < 0.01), and just over half (52.1%−57.0%) were directionally consistent and FDR-corrected significant (published set, p<10 −5 ).
a trend towards significancep < 0.010.2× alpha
The SWD group had significantly lower sleep efficiency than the non-SWD group, or showed a trend towards significance (on days off: 89 ± 5 and 94 ± 2%, Group: F 29.041 = 11.91, p < 0.01; before morning shifts: 87 ± 6 and 93 ± 4%, Group: F 27.304 = 11.84, p < 0.01; after evening shifts: 89 ± 4 and 94 ± 3%, Group: F 25.924 = 13.66, p < 0.01; and after night shifts: 90 ± 4 and 93 ± 3%, Group: F 22.373 = 3.73, p = 0.066, respectively).
Sleep and alertness in shift work disorder: findings of a field study.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health · 2019 · PMC6435614