In samples soaked in 0.5 g/100 mL NaHCO 3 , the blanching time had a significant ( p < 0.05) effect on the relative gray levels of the bands 2, 7, and 8 bands, while the difference in the relative gray level between bands 5 and 6 bands was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).
Excerpts
Only data meeting this normality assumption were subjected to further statistical analyses, including an ANOVA test, Duncan’s multiple comparison, and Pearson’s correlation analysis, with a significance level set at p < 0.05 and a highly significant level at p < 0.01.
H-L agglomeration was mainly distributed in the counties surrounding Xining important townships and cultivated land areas, showing an extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01); this indicates that the high LU degree and the low ESV intensity in this area formed a spatial agglomeration ( Figure 9 b).
Conversely, the populations of yeasts and aerobic bacteria in all groups exhibited an increasing trend during aerobic exposure, and the CON had the highest (Fig. 1 C-E) ( P < 0.01).
Root area could achieve highly significant correlations with root weight (P < 0.01 ) from the top and side view of the images and explain up to 60% of the variation present between manual and automatic measurement ( Fig. 5 D, E ) .
There were highly significant differences ( P -value < 0.01) by Duncan’s test at 8 h incubation (Fig. 4 A), at 10 h incubation (Fig. 4 B), and at 12 h incubation (Fig. 4 C).
Result The fitted model of the analysis of variance of effect of fungal spores at different inoculum load of fungi spores on biochemical parameters in lungs of balb/c mice produced a highly significant (p<0.01) effect on all reactive oxygen species and antioxidant parameters except for hydrogen peroxide which showed no significant difference for both treatments and inoculum concentration.
Statistical Analysis SPSS 17.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software was used for data analysis, Duncan’s test was used to test significance (‘*’ represent p < 0.05, significant; ‘**’ represent p < 0.01, highly significant).
The highly significant (P < 0.01) richness and Shannon diversity index values for samples from Western region forests could be attributed to the tropical nature of forests within this region such as sample K21 (Kakamega forest) which is considered an important biodiversity reservoir and the only remaining Guinea-Congolian tropical rain forest in Kenya 26 .
Among those significant eQTL SNP-feature pairs that were well-imputed, polymorphic and expressed in the replication dataset (~84% of pairs, ~95% of eFeatures, see Methods , Figure S6 ), >94% had consistent directionality in the two datasets, between 75.7% (eTxns) and 81.5% (eJxns) were directionally consistent and marginally significant (at p < 0.01), and just over half (52.1%−57.0%) were directionally consistent and FDR-corrected significant (published set, p<10 −5 ).
* indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** indicates an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).
One-way ANOVA was followed by LSD multiple comparisons and the Wilcoxon test when nonparametric tests were necessary ( p < 0.05 was considered significant, and p < 0.01 was considered highly significant).
Of these genes, 610 showed highly significant ( P < 0.01) positive selection ( SI Appendix , Table S14 ).
a trend towards significancep < 0.01
The SWD group had significantly lower sleep efficiency than the non-SWD group, or showed a trend towards significance (on days off: 89 ± 5 and 94 ± 2%, Group: F 29.041 = 11.91, p < 0.01; before morning shifts: 87 ± 6 and 93 ± 4%, Group: F 27.304 = 11.84, p < 0.01; after evening shifts: 89 ± 4 and 94 ± 3%, Group: F 25.924 = 13.66, p < 0.01; and after night shifts: 90 ± 4 and 93 ± 3%, Group: F 22.373 = 3.73, p = 0.066, respectively).
The carcinogenic group showed highly significant levels ( P <0.01) of CA15-3 (34.6 ± 0.07 U/ml) compared with control rats and T. officinale extract group only (15.3 ± 0.03 and 13.3 ± 0.05 U/ml, respectively).
The relative bioavailability of PZQ-PMMs was comparable to that of the PZQ 30% ethanol solution and was 1.7 times greater than that of commercially available preparations, with the increase in bioavailability being highly significant (P < 0.01).
Figure 2 shows how the bovine blood index (BBI) varied significantly across the transect, indicating a decreasing trend with increasing distance from the cattle shed (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49–0.73, P < 0.01).
A highly significant reduction was seen in the Group B treated with CM and DFDBA ( P < 0.01) when compared to Group A and Group C.
HCT and calcium also had a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.394, p < 0.01).
Pearson correlation between F ST and Jost's D was highly significant ( r = 0.970, p < 0.01), ensuring both estimators provided comparable results.
vWF and CD31 gene expression significantly increased with the increase of HB scaffold pore size going from 300 to 1,000 μm, while VE-cadherin gene expression showed a decreasing trend (ANOVA, p < 0.01).
Statistically significant changes were classed as significant [ ∗ ] where p < 0.05, highly significant [ ∗∗ ] where p < 0.01.
So proliferation in the three test antigens taken together is higher in group C than A1 and in group A day 57 than A day 1, and in both cases the difference is highly significant ( P < 0.01).
For all of the traits, the variations due to genotypes under this study were enormously significant (p<0.01).
There is a highly significant statistical connection between the number of people in waiting rooms and the energy equivalent sound level L Aeq (Spearman ρ = 0.485, p < 0.01).