The data were analyzed using a Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test using GraphPad prism 9 and the differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at P < 0.01 (**).
Excerpts
Under the condition of 20 °C, an extremely significant decrease in GYM-A concentration occurred at pH 5 and 7 after 8 months ( p < 0.01), of which 14.8 ± 3.7% decreased ( p < 0.05) within the first two-month period and 81.8 ± 9.3% decreased ( p < 0.01) after 8 months at pH 7, while it showed no obvious decline under the treatment of pH 3 ( p > 0.05).
CY group, Lentinan group, low dose group, and middle dose group compared with normal control group also had extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01).
Furthermore, it was found that BCF and the log[BCF] of wheat grains showed highly significant negative correlations ( p < 0.01) with total soil Cd, Ex-Cd, soil P, and soil Zn.
Differences were considered statistically significant at P <0.05, and extremely significant at P <0.01.
In contrast, both doses of fusion protein caused highly significant effects on survival ( p < 0.01).
The majority of isoforms with highly significant differences between their decay rates ( P < 0.01) lie within 10–100 bp of each other.
Correspondingly, the NE count was the highest in the observation group with a highly significant difference from the three control groups ( p < 0.01), as was the MONO count.
And a highly significant (Figure 1 B, P < 0.01) reduction of miR-34a in 12 of 14 MIBC tissues was observed.
The difference in the thicknesses of the small airway wall was markedly significant between the controls (7.6±1.1 μm 2 /μm) and the WS group (14.3±3.3 μm 2 /μm, p<0.01) or the CS group (12.1±3.4 μm 2 /μm, p<0.01) ( Figure 2h ).
A highly significant linear increase in pinnacle height of ~0.3 mm y −1 (r 2 = 0.97, p < 0.01) was seen in the known-age part of the water column, that is, from 6–14 m.
However, for carbon stable isotopes, the difference between the EH-GLG and XXL-LS populations reached a highly significant level ( p < 0.01); at the same time, the δ 13 C values of the hairs from the XXL-LS was different from the QL population ( p < 0.05), while the disparity of GLG and QL populations was not evident ( p > 0.05) in carbon isotopes ( Figure 3 a).
When compared with the control group, the increase of P1 larvae after 10 μM U0126 treatment was highly significant (p<0.01; Fig. 3G ).
The features that reached a highly significant level ( p <0.01) were selected.
Overall, Wilcoxon statistical analysis of the relief of disability showed a highly significant improvement after vertebroplasty (p<0.01).
This protection was highly significant ( P < 0.01) when compared to the cells treated with H 2 O 2 and without chaperone peptides.
The p -values for the three response models—moisture content (Y 1 ), crispness (Y 2 ), and sensory score (Y 3 )—all reached a highly significant level ( p < 0.01).
Eight proteins (IL-2Rα, CRP, IL-8, ICAM-1, TIMP-1, TNFR1, HGF, and CA19.9) resulted in highly significant results ( P -value <0.01 for two-sample t tests comparing patients with and without GVHD).
Separate analyses, using the probability of a foraging trail having loaded ants, showed that the genus-level differences in loaded and unloaded returning foragers per hour were highly significant (χ 2 1 = 7.567, p<0.01), but that the differences in loaded returning workers between species within genera were not significant (χ 2 4 = 1.257, p = 0.87).
Difference was considered significant at * P < 0.05 and highly significant at ** P < 0.01.
Among them, the protein levels of TLR4 and MyD88 in the Bilo+Ly group were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).
Levels of significance were set to P < 0.001 highly significant (**) and P < 0.01 significant (*). 3.
AMMI analysis The combined variance analysis of grain yield data of 40 quinoa genotypes in eight environments ( Table 4 ) showed that the effects of G, E, and G×E interaction were highly significant (P ≤ 0.01), indicating a significant difference in average grain yield among environments and genotypes, as well as the fluctuation of the grain yield of quinoa genotypes from one environment to another.
This made the difference in c-Fos protein expression between stressed Demonstrators of the two strains highly significant ( p < 0.01, Figure 3G ).
The results were considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01**.