The results of the branch-site unrestricted test for episodic diversification (BUSTED) showed a highly significant result ( P < 0.01) in the likelihood ratio test, providing robust evidence that SVA experienced episodic positive selection.
Excerpts
The item “As regards the HPV vaccination, I was clear about the best choice for my daughter” was borderline significant ( r = .09; p = .01); mothers seemed more likely to let their daughter receive the HPV vaccination if they agreed with this statement.
In gut wall tumours, however, there was a highly significant (P<0.01) increase in COD by 90%; no significant change in COD occurred in the intra-muscular tumours.
Statistical differences were considered highly significant when p < 0.01 and significant when p < 0.05.
In terms of the chlorophyll content at the defoliation stage, the effect of irrigation volume on the basis of the predicted ET c on the chlorophyll content was highly significant ( P < 0.01) compared with that in the CK; for both W0-W1, the chlorophyll content increased; for W2–W3, the change in chlorophyll content was not significant, whereas for W4, the change in chlorophyll content decreased.
In all cases, differences were considered to be significant when p<0.05 and highly significant when p<0.01.
A significant level was measured at p≤0.05, and highly significant at p≤0.01.
Differences were considered significant at * P value < 0.05, highly significant at ** P value < 0.01, and *** P value < 0.001.
Mean IID scores of normal and OSCC are 0.5% and 9.73% showed highly significant difference with the P < 0.01 [ Table 4 and Graph 5 ].
Patterns #1 (Forehead + nose), #4 (Forehead), and #5 (Above lip) exhibited highly significant differences with the proposed model ( p < 0.01) compared to both Model 1 and Model 2.
Groups B and D were similar (p = 0.396), and the differences between all other group pairs were highly significant (all p<0.01).
Highly significant correlations were found between r 50′(SC) and V t for the three brain regions analysed (hippocampus: Pearson r = 0.87, P < 0.01; thalamus: Pearson r = 0.96, P < 0.001 and amygdala: Pearson r = 0.84, P < 0.01) after exclusion of the [ 18 F]-PBR111-negative animal (Figure 7 ).
No significant difference for turbidity was seen with respect to seasons and months P ≥ 0.05, whereas highly significant difference was recorded for sites P < 0.01 and the R for the 3 stations was 0.41.
AFP level was monitored and its reduction from baseline (before treatment) to the end of radiotherapy resulted highly significant for the entire cohort of patients (20% reduction, p<0.01).
Examination of these coefficients with a T- test shows that the percentage yield of NUCF ( Y 1 ), percentage of MUFA (OA) ( Y 3 ), percentage of PUFA (LA) ( Y 4 ), the linear term of urea-to-FAs ratio ( X 1 ) and quadratic term of urea-to-FAs were highly significant ( p < 0.01), while the percentage of SFAs ( Y 2 ), the linear term was significant at p < 0.05.
Linear regression (log 2 (volume) = 1.85 + 2.43 log 2 (valve dimension); N = 596) was highly significant (p < 0.01) and explained 92% of variance ( Supplementary Fig.
Difference between groups was considered highly significant (**) when p≤ 0.01 and significant (*) when p≤ 0.05.
The analysis revealed that the SR had highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with the FW, DHA, SOD, POD, and CAT, while showing highly significant negative correlations with MDA and PRO.
The MANOVA revealed a highly significant effect for the group variable (Hotellings’ T 2 = 0.80, p < 0.01).
By contrast, the positivity rate among those screened showed a negative trend (6.3% to 2.1%, p <.01).
Mice treated with BMSCs showed a decreasing trend in BALF protein levels compared with the mice in the SM group (42.42 ± 1.94 versus 72.49 ± 4.83, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3 d left channel).
In contrast, men have a disadvantage compared with the reference sample (-0.337) that is highly significant for the workload variable (p < 0.01) as well as for the ‘salaried activity’ variable (p < 0.05).
As shown in Appendix , all the AVEs values of all constructs surpasses the 0.50 level ( Fornell and Larcker, 1981 ), and the factor loadings were highly significant ( P < 0.01), ranging from 0.659 to 0.821.
Consequently, the differences in mean RFI values and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) between LRFI and HRFI chickens in each breed were highly significant ( p < 0.01). 3.2.
We selected only specific time intervals where the regression line between O 2 % air saturation and time was highly significant ( p < 0.01; R 2 > 0.90).