Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison of MAGECAA v1.0 with the Original Manual Method As shown in Figure 4 , Spearman's correlation analysis identified that there is a highly significant linear correlation between MAGEc and MAGEo ( r = 0.998, resp.; P < 0.01), and the mean difference found in Bland-Altman plot was −0.03 ± 0.21, which was statistically significantly small.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
At the alpha diversity level, TN significantly positively affected TD (R = 0.28, p < 0.05 *), while TP exerted a highly significant positive effect on PD (R = 0.42, p < 0.01 **) and a highly significant negative effect on TD and FD (R = −0.42, p < 0.001 ***; R = −0.46, p < 0.001 ***).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In the present analysis, highly significant positive correlations were observed between total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, particularly ORAC ( r = 0.98, p < 0.01) and PSC ( r = 0.77, p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In our study, a highly significant linear correlation was exhibited between N- trans -caffeoyl-tyramine and ABTS and FRAP values, with r = 0.766 and r = 0.752, respectively ( p < 0.01) as well as between cannabisin A with ABTS and FRAP values, with r = 0.800 and r = 0.811 ( p < 0.01), respectively.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Phosphorus Use Efficiency (PUE) in ajowan Analysis of variance showed that the main effects of cropping system, phosphorus fertilizer treatments, and their interactions—including cropping system × phosphorus fertilizer, year × cropping system, and year × phosphorus fertilizer were highly significant ( p < 0.01) for the phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) index in ajowan (Table 5 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
On the basis of the generated genetic map, we identified a highly significant QTL (genome-wide significance p < 0.01) for different carcass weights on chromosome 7 with a peak position at 91 cM (157 Mb), a significant QTL (p < 0.05) for bone mass on chromosome 9 at 61 cM (65 Mb), and another one for drip loss on chromosome 12 at 94 cM (128 Mb).
Despite the modest improvement in AUC, reclassification metrics showed significant improvement (IDI =0.015, P=0.01; continuous NRI did not reach statistical significance), and DCA demonstrated greater net clinical benefit for the full model across a broad range of threshold probabilities.