Excerpts

* indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05); ** indicates a highly significant difference (p < 0.01).

6 b), an effect highly significant already from the first minutes after delivery through the entire three hours of incubation (p < 0.01).

Notably, the P2 treatment group showed a highly significant improvement in sperm viability and mitochondrial membrane potential ( P < 0.01).

The difference is highly significant ( P < 0.01) showing that response with Kin was an order of magnitude greater than with Random.

The results of AMMI combined analysis of variance across six environments for the 15 genotypes of 100-kernel weight revealed that tested treatments (T), genotypes (G), environments (E), interaction (G × E), and the IPCA1 were highly significant (p < 0.01) ( Table 8 ).

The difference is highly significant ( P < 0.01), indicating that the foci are not randomly distributed between bivalents.

Differences were considered significant at p<0.05 and highly significant at p<0.01.

A highly significant difference ( p ≤ 0.01) in RBA was noted on day 100 of lactation, and a significant increase in PKA was observed in experimental ewes on days 28 ( p ≤ 0.01) and 100 ( p ≤ 0.05) of lactation.

Among them, norank_f__ norank_o__norank_c__Alphaproteobacteria and norank_f __Euzebyaceae showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in the relative abundance among all samples.

Redundancy analysis results also revealed that AP, HCO 3 – , pH, Ca 2+ , SO 4 2– , and K + had a highly significant impact on the bacterial community structure ( P < 0.01), while pH and SO 4 2– had a significant impact on the fungal community structure ( P < 0.05).

NO 3 - -N was notably correlated with bacterial community diversity (Shannon and Simpson indexes), with NO 3 - -N and the Simpson index showing an extremely significant positive correlation ( r = 0.656, P < 0.01).

Among them, nanH exhibited a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01), whereas nanI and nanJ showed significant differences ( p < 0.05).

As depicted in Figure 2 , there were several sets of significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlations between the flavonoids and phenolic acids.

Statistical differences were considered highly significant at p < 0.01, significant at p < 0.05 and a tendency at 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1 a — p < 0.05; b — p < 0.01; c — p < 0.001; d — p ≤ 0.10. 2.9.

The trend of PRL and PRLR mRNA expression ( Figures 3 F and 3 I) was similar to that of hypothalamic VIP , which gradually increased with the duration of the experiment and showed a highly significant increase on d 27 and 45 ( P < 0.01).

The t-value of the predictor variables’ beta regression coefficients was found to be highly significant (p < 0.01).

They were observed to have a highly significant quadratic regression relationship with dietary protein levels ( P < 0.01).

Subjects also showed a trend toward increased in the regional CBF ( p = 0.01) in the STWM_L after 3-months of rehabilitation relative to 1-month.

There was a highly significant linear relationship between soil respiration and soil moisture; soil moisture explained 47–61% of the monthly variations in soil respiration ( P < 0.01, Fig 5 and Table 2 ).

3.2 GCA and SCA variances Under optimum conditions, the effect of environment was highly significant (P ≤ 0.01) for all traits ( Table 6 ).

mirabilis: imipenem was substantially significant with a p-value of <0.05, while aztreonam, gentamicin, and meropenem were highly significant with a p-value of <0.01 (a p-value less than or equal to 0.05 is considered statistically significant, while that greater than 0.05 is considered not statistically significant).

As more interviewees chose relaxation and assess to nature in parks, taking these as the focus of the analysis, there was an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlation between the relaxation behaviors of park users with waterscape ( p = 0.002) and greenery landscapes ( p = 0.001) of the urban parks.

Statistical differences were designated as significant if p -values were less than 0.05 (* p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant if p -values were less than 0.01 (** p ≤ 0.01).

In fact, for the more-closely spaced condition of Experiment 1, the slope did not vary across the session, F(3,147) < 1 (See Figure 5 ), and, for the more-closely spaced condition of Experiment 2, the slope showed a nearly significant pattern of decrease across the session, linear component: F(1,49) = 7.13, MSe = 2.66, p = 0.01, overall effect: F(3,147) = 2.52, MSe = 2.68, = 0.06 (See Figure 6 ) .

This was highly significant for intracellular, cell wall and total extracts obtained from C. purpureus and S. antarctici (P < 0.01) where concentrations had doubled within a month in their natural environment; but was only significant for the cell wall extract of B. pseudotriquetrum (P < 0.05; Table 2 ) when analysed individually via Student’s t-tests (not significant in the two-way ANOVA of all species).