Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In group D, there was no significant difference in defecation problems ( P > 0.05), but a significant difference in adverse reactions of chemotherapy ( P < 0.05), and a highly significant difference in body image, future expectation, sexual function, and sexual satisfaction ( P < 0.01).
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
In the same column of data in the table, if the letters are the same, the difference is not significant ( p > 0.05); if the letters are completely different, the difference is significant; lowercase letters indicate a significant level ( p < 0.05); uppercase letters indicate an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Clostridium_sensu_stricto_2 was the dominant bacterial genus in deeply spoiled ham ( Figure 2 b), with highly significant positive correlations with heptanal, (E)-2-octenal, 2-nonanone and (E)-2-nonenal ( p < 0.01), there was a significant positive correlation with hexanal and nonanal (0.05 > p > 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Starting from the second day of the experiment, the time taken by the T2DM group to find the platform (escape latency) was significantly longer than that of the control group, and a highly significant difference was observed between the two groups on the third and fourth days ( p < 0.01, p < 0.001) (b).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In group O157, the level of TNF-α showed even highly significant level than group CK (p < 0.01), while showing significantly higher level than group PR39 + O157 (p < 0.05), though there still existed significance between group CK and PR39 + O157 (Supplemental Fig.
a significant trendP = 0.010.2× alphagold
In stenoses up to 40 mm long, resting wave-free flow velocity was preserved at 24.1 ± 12.6 cm/s; in stenoses over 40 mm, flow velocity was 19.1 ± 7.9, creating a significant trend ( P = 0.01) although not a significant difference in mean values by ANOVA ( P = 0.62) or T -test ( P = 0.15).
a decreasing trendP < 0.010.2× alphagold
Compared with the TEAS group, the expression of LC3-I and p62 in the T + 3-MA group increased, while LC3-II showed a decreasing trend in the T + 3-MA group ( Figure 3(c) , 3(d) ) (compared with Sham group, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; compared with Model group, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001; compared with TEAS group, && P < 0.01). 4.
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Growth Relationship between Above-Ground and Underground Biomass of Glycyrrhiza uralensis under Water Stress Under different water stress treatments, there was an extremely significant correlation between the below-ground biomass (BGB) and the above-ground biomass (AGB) of Glycyrrhiza uralensis ( p < 0.01), and the allometric growth relationship was biased toward under-ground biomass accumulation ( Figure 2 ).