Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 0.0000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
In addition, the analysis of TE distribution with respect to predicted genes showed that full-length Gypsy elements were distributed uniformly across the 16 pseudo-chromosomes, irrespective of gene location, whereas a highly significant negative correlation was observed between the density of full-length Copia elements and gene density ( R = −0.46, P = 0.0000) (Additional file 8 ).
highly significantp = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Highly significant interactions between main effects of time and ɛ 4 allele were noted for all cognitive measures: MMSE ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000), CDR-SB ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000), ADAS-11 ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000), and MoCA ( ɛ 3/ ɛ 3 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000; ɛ 3/ ɛ 4 versus ɛ 4/ ɛ 4 p = 0.000).
highly significantP = 0.0000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
Results After one year of Homeopathic treatment, reduction in serum IgE level (1006.83±395.17 versus 336.5±126.96), absolute eosinophil count (600.33±103.61 versus 302.5±82.21) and symptom score (30.27±5.12 versus 12.83±2.72) were statistically highly significant (paired t test; t 29 = 10.84, 18.17 & 22.37 respectively; P = 0.0000) with 95% confidence level.
highly significantP = 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
One author suggests that if the result is highly significant, P value should not be written as “P = 0.000” but presented as “P < 0.001.”[ 7 ] For any range, it is better to avoid using the dash “-” as it may be misinterpreted as a negative sign; instead, it should be presented as “between and,” for example, BMI ranged between 25.1 and 34.9 kg/m 2 . 6 Tables and figures are the cornerstones of the result.
Faultless impressive results: How can I do it?
Saudi J Anaesth · 2019 · PMC6398297
highly significantP ≤ 0.00a p-value is never exactly 0qualifiedgold
In Table 5 it was reported that the age group of study participants was significantly P ≤ 0.05*, (Significant) associated with the attitude of dental practitioners while years of experience was significantly associated with knowledge P ≤ 0.01**, (Highly Significant) and practice P ≤ 0.00***, (Highly Significant) of the study participants.