A low but highly significant level of population differentiation was observed between the European-1 and -2 subclusters (F CT 0.018, P < 0.00001, Table 5 ); 59% of genetic distances between populations of the two subclusters were significant, but only 14% and 22% of the intracluster distances were significant.
Excerpts
The addition of radiotherapy therefore resulted in a substantial absolute benefit (locoregional recurrence was avoided in 17.4% of women at 10 years) as well as a highly significant relative benefit (risk ratio 0.31; P < 0.00001).
Highly significant difference was also observed in staining intensities between low malignant cases and highly malignant cases (χ 2 test, P<0.00001).
The results were highly significant for all parameters (Wald χ 2 (1) < 10,000, p < 0.00001 in all cases).
A highly significant relationship was found between the preview method and the status of people (belonging or not to the dental field) (Chi-square= 33.48; P <0.00001).
The results showed a highly significant association between BRCA1 promoter methylation with breast cancer in Asia (OR = 8.78 [95% CI 4.15-18.56, p < 0.00001]).
Because of the large number of samples, the comparisons gave highly significant results, typically with p < 0.00001 after Bonferroni correction. 2.6.4 Simple and complex extensions of spectral statistical parametric mapping (sSPM) In our more recent studies' we have standardized the frequency domain analysis.
A three within-subjects RAnova (type of score × block × ear) showed a highly significant type of score effect, [ F (1.7,103) = 235, p < 0.00001, η p = 0.80, ω 2 = 0.22], with greater phonemes scores than word scores; block effect [ F (1,59) = 13, p < 0.00001, η p = 0.19, ω 2 = 0.022] with greater scores for the second block ( Figure 2A ), but no overall significant ear effect [ F (1,59) = 2.2, p = ns].
The factors affected the degree of Artemisia polysaccharide extraction differently, the primary term affected D (<0.0001) > C (0.0076) > A (0.0023) > B (0.384), the interaction AB, AC, AD, BC, BD were not significant ( P > 0.05), CD was significant ( P < 0.005), the secondary terms A 2 , B 2 , C 2 , D 2 were extremely significant ( P < 0.00001).
There was a highly significant difference between CT and T2 scores ( P < .00001) and between T1 and T2 scores ( P < .00001).
Phenotypic correlation Highly significant correlations were found between dormancy and GA 3 content in tubers ( P <0.00001).
The difference in classification performance between sexes was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U‐test, p < 0.00001, Figure 4A , effect size d = 0.8), showing a strong sex‐related bias in models trained without using ERP features.
This difference between the juvenile and adult volumes was highly significant ( P < 10 −5 , unpaired t test, t = 7.9, d.f. = 14, comparing trace volumes of juveniles with trace volumes of non-manipulated adult birds with n ≥ 6 HVC X /bird).
Results Nadi Shodhana Pranayama showed a significant decrease in ART (p = 0.01) and Bhramari Pranayama showed a highly significant decrease in ART (p < 0.00001).
An unpaired Student's t -test demonstrated that both combination treatments were significantly different to the appropriate controls, which resulted in an overall highly significant one-way ANOVA test ( P <0.00001).
The detected linkage disequilibrium was highly significant in both cases (P<10 −5 ).
Statistical analysis confirmed that the deviations from population norms were highly significant for the overall group (N = 123, p = 0.00001), as well as separately for girls (N = 59, p = 0.00001) and boys (N = 64, p = 0.00001).
The linear-regression analysis between the number of CAG repeats in the expanded allele and age at onset was highly significant ( p < 0.00001).
Not surprisingly, the effect of motion direction was highly significant (t(17)=21, p<10 -5 ).
The significance tests of correlation coefficients revealed that the majority of the correlations between these genes were extremely significant ( P < 1 e − 5, Figure 5(b) ).
Highly significant differences were observed between susceptible and resistant UTI groups ( p = 0.00001 and p = 0.000015, respectively), indicating BCG cycles as a key differentiating factor.
Of these, five genes ( atp H, ndh K, psb E, rps 11, and rps 4) displayed highly significant variation ( P < 0.00001).
The highly significant P-value (P < 0.00001) in our study suggests a non-random occurrence, further emphasizing the condition’s strong presence in the population under investigation.
It was showed that 10 mg/d vortioxetine had extremely significant difference on nausea when compared to placebo (OR=4.18, 95% CI=3.21 to 5.44, P<0.00001, Z=10.62 I2=0%) in results.
A permutation test for a difference in the mean final acuity between these two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.00001).