Excerpts

5 ) compared with patients in the control group was also highly significant (44.0% vs. 7.4%, P < 0.0001).

Again, we did not observe an increase in the proportion of adult mosquitoes, rather a marginally significant decrease with VIT8× (Fig. 1A , proportion of adults: p < 0.0001; AUX vs GF, VIT4×, or VIT8×: p < 0.0001; GF vs VIT4×: p = 0.73; GF vs VIT8×: p = 0.058; Supplementary Data 2 ).

The differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The cranial base length showed a weak negative correlation with AHI ( ρ = −0.25; p < 0.05) but showed a strong and highly significant correlation with the mandibular length ( ρ = 0.70; p < 0.0001).

On comparison of Intrastromal TIL with the clinicopathological features, it was recognised that at the 95% Confidence Interval as shown in Table 2 - There was a significant association of age (p = 0.0147) with the intrastromal TIL count followed by a highly significant association found with the HRBC subtype (p < 0.0001), TNBC subtype (p < 0.0001) and HER2BC subtype (p = 0.0025).

Furthermore, after 30 min of histone treatment, we revealed a significantly different MDW compared to respective controls ( p = 0.0012), whereas histone + LPS showed an extremely significant difference vs control ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 B).

Our result showed that lower ureteral wall thickness was associated with a higher chance of stone passage, and the correlation was highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).

The profiles of IgG in urine in the curative treatment group showed a significant trend of decline with time post-treatment (Kruskal-Wallis test = 113.4–212.6, p value < 0.0001) and the lowest levels were seen 12 months post-treatment.

K−M survival analysis of the training and validation cohorts revealed highly significant differences between these two groups (p < 0.0001), as shown in Figure 5 .

Thus, we calculated that the likelihood of 15 consecutive successes (= correct identification of slides) was (l/2) 15 = 6.1 × 10 -5 , which means that the result is highly significant (p < 0.0001) and unlikely to consequence of chance.

A more recent analysis for NHANES 2007–2010 data found a significant trend ( P < 0.0001) toward higher HEI 2010 scores for children who consumed 12 oz of juice/d (HEI = 52.3) than those who did not consume juice (HEI = 43.8) ( 40 ) There are reports that argue fruit juice consumption is comparable with consuming sugar-sweetened beverages that contribute to overweight and obesity, particularly among children ( 41 – 43 ).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences between the control and diabetic groups ( p = 0.0001) and between the control and diabetic nephropathy groups ( p < 0.0001).

Friedman's analysis of variance revealed that there was a highly significant variation at all frequencies (p = 0.0001).

Both of the main effects, sample and clone, are highly significant (both P < 0.0001).

Given that these two gene expression measurements were conducted independently and on different RNA extraction batches, the observed agreement in fold change for 110/161 genes is highly significant (one-tailed Fisher’s Exact Test, p < 0.0001; Additional file 2 : Table S4).

The multivariable regression analysis revealed a highly significant, positive linear association between log(NfL) and age ( p = 0.0001), indicating that NfL increased by 1.4% (95% CI 1.0%–2.1%) with each additional year of age, whereas it showed a weak, inverse association with storage time ( p = 0.02), suggesting a 0.3% (95% CI 0.1%–0.5%) decrease with each additional year of storage; additionally, NfL was 17.0% (95% CI 0.0%–37.9%) higher in male than in female patients, although the association between NfL and sex was not statistically significant ( p = 0.054).

However, a highly significant difference was observed among the groups for pain scoring, with a p-value of <0.0001 at all times (Table 2 ).

We found highly significant differences in the relative volume of all brain regions across populations (all regions p < 0.0001, figure 2 ; electronic supplementary material, figure S7 and table S9), and between sexes (all regions p < 0.05, figure 2 ; electronic supplementary material, table S9).

0119), thereafter extremely significant difference began to occur (Kruskal-Wallis test p < 0. 0001).

The interaction effect of age and SDC during childhood was highly significant (P < 0.0001).

P values were represented as asterisks; p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant: 0.01–0.05, significant (*); 0.01–0.001, very significant (**); 0.001–0.0001, highly significant (***); p<0.0001, extremely significant (****).

We also found highly significant differences in CD8, CD4 and CD3 staining in tumors between TIL growers and non-growers (p<0.0001).

Among them, white blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and fecal calprotectin showed extremely significant differences between healthy individuals and UC patients ( P < 0.0001).

The difference across the five main classes (CRC, APL, non-advanced adenoma, non-neoplastic and no pathology) was significant ( P < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis) and remained highly significant comparing all classes excluding CRC (P < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis).

BDI and IDS-SR 30 showed a highly significant intercorrelation ( r = 0.82, P < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.67–0.91).