Two-way ANOVA showed highly significant time-dependent block for all peptides compared to control ( p < 0.0001, F = 6.83, df = 9).
Excerpts
The changes with time were, as expected from earlier studies (Lee et al.,, 1991a) very highly significant, but more interestingly so was the interaction between time and dose (P<0.0001).
Maxillary central incisors were the most commonly impacted teeth with a prevalence rate reported at 78.8%, while the results were found to be statistically highly significant when compared between maxillary and mandibular teeth ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 3 ].
brachypus at 2 g/kg in feed or 2 g/L in water led to a highly significant reduction in total cholesterol (by up to 65.9 ± 1.72 mg/dL, p < 0.0001) and a significant elevation in HDL cholesterol (by up to 25.9 ± 1.72 mg/dL, p < 0.0001) in broiler chickens.
As anticipated from the SR2508 urinary excretion data, the relationship was highly significant (r = 0.626, P = .0001).
Under supplementation with 5 mM L-Trp, the IAA yield increased to 6.01 ± 0.15 μg/mL, representing a 274% enhancement, which was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 8 C).
After induction of general anesthesia and creation of pneumoperitoneum, a progressive increase in modified LUS score was seen after intubation, after deflation of pneumoperitoneum, 30 min after extubation and 24 h post-extubation compared to the baseline Preoperatively; the difference is statistically highly significant, P < 0.0001 ( Fig. 3 ).
The proportion of subjects with a SFS total score < 140 was 9.1% in HC, 57.7% in FR, and 95.4% in SCZ, and there was a significant trend for the proportion of patients with SFS < 140 to increase continuously among the three groups (P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 ).
Pooled analysis of all trials found a highly significant reduction in recurrence (RR 0·66, 95% CI 0·62 to 0·71; p<0·0001; figure 1 ) and breast cancer mortality (0·67, 0·61 to 0·73; p<0·0001; appendix p 7 ) with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab compared with chemotherapy alone.
Marbling Score and REA The mean marbling score evaluated in both laboratories for the striploins of different experimental groups showed greater values for the CAB striploins than for the CTNA counterpart ( Table 1 ), with highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).
In a separate model of the group of secondary auditory sites, in contrast, these factors are highly significant ( t = 7.17; p< 0.0001, and t = 3.89; p = 0.0002, respectively), showing that in secondary auditory areas such modulation is call-specific.
Alveolar septal fibrosis was observed in 90.9% of patients with IPF (30/33), whereas none of the control subjects exhibited this finding (0/23), indicating a highly significant difference between groups (Fisher's exact test, P<0.0001).
Moreover, the mean taxa determinism of bacterial communities exhibited a decreasing trend from S03 to S07 (mean determinism: S03, 39; S05, 22; S07, 19; P < .0001 by the Kruskal–Wallis test), with significant differences observed among the three stations by the Dunn Kruskal–Wallis test (S03 vs S05, adjusted P = .04; S03 vs S07, adjusted P < .0001; S05 vs S07, adjusted P < .0001).
The seed viability ranged from 18% (E09) to 81% (N01), and there were a positive and highly significant relationships between seed germination and viability traits (r = 0.883; P < 0.0001).
ChatGPT-5 again had the highest score (71.67 ± 6.17), followed by DeepSeek-V3.2 (66.00 ± 5.07), Gemini (61.67 ± 5.88), and Claude Sonnet (59.00 ± 6.87), with a highly significant overall difference ( p < 0.0001).
In this analysis, group differences in subjective pain scores were highly significant before controlling for the effect of anterior cingulate cortex activation ( F = 38.0, P <0.0001); a finding that was reversed ( F = 1.8, P = 0.195) when removing (regressing out) this effect.
This difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001; ANOVA test with Bonferroni post-hoc).
Statistical analysis confirmed that the change is highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; n = 5 each for WT and KO).
Analysis of variance exhibited that effect of T2 (50 mM of KNO 3 ), T4 (150 mM of KNO 3 ) were highly significant ( P < 0.0001, and P < 0.001 respectively) on final seed germination (%) among all priming treatments.
Then, a two-way ANOVA factorial analysis revealed that the clinical state of the patients’ plasmas tested (“steady state” versus “acute phase”) had a highly significant effect ( p < 0001) on PS-exposure quantification.
When the combined group of 8 patients with hypercalcaemia is compared with the control group the difference is statistically highly significant (Mann Whitney, U Test P=0.0001).
Gram-positive strains were notably more common in the non-survivor group, identified in 35 patients (42%) compared to just 10 patients (10%) in the survivor group, a highly significant difference (p<0.0001).
The results depicted in Figure 3 - for the TBRs, mf prevalence breakpoints and R 0 - show not only that a wide distribution of values is consistent with the data in each study community when the model is fitted to mf age prevalence but also that they can vary significantly between the study communities [kruskal-wallis tests of differences in estimated values of each variable indicating highly significant study effects in each case ( P < 0.0001 in each case)].
This rate was highly significant (p < 0.0001) when compared to 1.4% in the control group which comprised of age and sex matched HIV-negative healthy persons.
Highly significant intraobserver agreement was observed between the measurements of the two 6 MWT trials (ICC = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85–0.97; p < 0.0001).