Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Every comparison reported highly significant differences: absolute initial angles for clockwise trials were smaller in the negative ( t 17 = -4.72, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.6, P = 0.001); for counter-clockwise perturbations the initial angles were also smaller in the negative ( t 17 = 4.03, P < 10 −4 ) and positive contexts ( t 17 = -3.61, P = 0.001, one-sided paired t-tests).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The active fraction’s ability to reduce the duration of immobility was assessed, and the difference was highly significant compared with that of the control ( p < 0.0001; n = 6).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation of serum miR 21 to age; tumor size and biochemical and molecular investigations revealed that miR 21 was directly correlated to α-fetoprotein (P = 0.006, significant); HDL (p < 0.0001, highly significant); miR -199 was inversely correlated to α-fetoprotein (P = 0.009, significant); miRNA 155 as directly correlated to α-fetoprotein (p = 0.001, significant) and serum total bilirubin (p = 0.037, significant).
Relation between microRNAs and Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci · 2016 · PMC4884247
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, tg a 20 +/+;TK+ mice treated with GCV showed a median incubation time of 50 dpi, with a highly significant acceleration of progression compared with PBS-treated tg a 20 +/+;TK+ mice (7 d; P < 0.0001; Fig. 2 A ); under no other conditions were tg a 20 mice reported to develop scrapie so rapidly.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The model established from 15 experimental runs (including three center points) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), exhibited excellent goodness-of-fit (R 2 = 0.9304), and demonstrated good predictive capability (predicted R 2 = 0.8434), confirming the reliability of the model ( Table S3 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis assessing model fit revealed a better fit for the model including CASP-12 score, depressive symptoms, age and sex (Bayes information criterion 42,354.75) compared with the same model excluding CASP-12 score (Bayes information criterion 42,402.88) (a lower Bayes information criterion score indicates a better model fit); this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).