Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, we noted a 20-fold increase in the frequency of H2AX −/− bouquet-stage nuclei ( H2AX −/− , 6%; wild-type, 0.4%; based on 2,567 mutant and 2,772 wild-type spermatogenic nuclei), with the differences being highly significant (P < 0.0001; χ 2 and Fisher test; Fig. 2 B).
H2AX regulates meiotic telomere clustering.
J Cell Biol · 2003 · PMC2173436
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As shown in Figure 1 C, inhibition of each of the RNA sensors resulted in highly significant increased growth of H37Rv-mCherry as detected by IFC/ImageStream relative to its control cell line at 24 h (RIG-I: p < 0.0001; MDA5: p < 0.0001; MAVS: p = 0.002) or 48 h (RIG-I: p < 0.0001; MDA5: p < 0.0001; MAVS: p = 0.0008) post-infection.
highly significantp -value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Post hoc pairwise comparisons following highly significant Kruskal-Wallis test ( p -value < 0.0001) revealed four major groups reflecting significantly different PC distribution patterns within the ML (Fig. 7c ): ordered monolayer (group I), ordered multilayer (II), scattered multilayer (III) and totally scattered (IV).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As shown in Table 3 , highly significant improvements were found in the SAQ score, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and disease perception ( p < 0.0001 for all) in the GXST group, while there were no significant differences in physical limitations between the two groups (60.1 ± 10.5 vs. 58.0 ± 11.7, p = 0.11).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A minimum dose effect was observed at a volumetric concentration of 2.0 mg/mL of 3 in the food, which significantly deterred the shrimp from feeding ( p = 0.01), while a very highly significant rejection response was obtained when testing 3 at a concentration of 3.0 mg/mL ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5 ). 3.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, there was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001; d = 2.41) performance difference in favor of the VP group which doubled its test scores with 60.8 points (SD = 9.6) and showed a stronger effect size (d VP = 3.3 vs. d SGT = 1.42) than the SGT group which achieved 40.3 points (SD = 7.2).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001837.supp2 Supplementary data Correlations of anaemia between children and women Despite the fact that the prevalence of anaemia in women was much lower than in children, the prevalence of total anaemia, moderate+severe anaemia and mean haemoglobin concentration between children and women showed a highly significant, strong positive correlation (0.80, 0.76, 0.79, respectively; p<0.0001 for all).