Excerpts

At test re-test, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.914, while the intra class correlation was 0.9160 (95% confidence interval 0.941–0.975), which is a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.0001).

The regression and correlation analyses between gestational age and the studied parameters were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

While the correlations between SPAD measurements and disease severity scores were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), they were relatively weak except for SM, which is a binary metric in which only disease severity levels of 1 (not affected) or 5 (severely affected) were observed.

The frequency of clinch attacks showed a trend for diminishing along the exposure trials [F (1,18) = 33.72, p < 0.0001; F (2,36) = 2.9, p = 0.07 for genotype and trial sequence effects respectively, in 2way RM-ANOVA].

The difference between median value of C PRSA and C RAW was highly significant (0.79 [IQR 0.69–0.90] and 0.29 [IQR 0.17–0.47], respectively; p<0.0001).

There was a highly significant interaction between population and temperature 2 ( F 3,2126 = 15.34, P < 0.0001) indicating that the pattern of ticks questing with temperature varied between populations.

Interestingly, the newly emerging glycemic marker glycated albumin showed a highly significant difference in both the groups (Group II: P= 0.0001, Group III: P<0.0001) when compared with control.

At the L3 level, sex ( P = 0.081) and HCT‐CI ( P = 0.225) did not achieve significance, while age ( P < 0.0001), BMI ( P < 0.0001), and DRI ( P = 0.019) performed like their counterparts at the T4 level.

Specifically, CHRNA5 , HYKK , and PSMA4 demonstrated highly significant differential expression between LC patients and healthy controls (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.0001).

Blepharitis scores showed an increasing trend from 1 to 7 dpi (ANOVA: p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 A).

The decrease was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001). 3.1.1.2.

The A/California strain showed a trend characterized by two different peaks: the first in 2010/2011 (49.0%, 95% CI 39.0–59.0; p < 0.0001 vs. 2009/2010 for HI results) and the second one in 2014/2015 (53.0%, 95% CI 43.0–62.0; p = 0.004 vs. 2013/2014 for HI results).

Results Axial length Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant interaction between the type of defocus and time of measurement for axial length measures across the six defocus conditions (F (20,300) = 4.60, p < 0.0001).

The Friedman test was highly significant (p < 0.0001, Friedman chi 2 = 116.97, df = 3, Kendall’s W = 0.6045).

A highly significant ( p < 0.0001) decrease from t0 to t1 was observed in: oxidized glutathione (−56% vs. −79%, Figure 2 A); oxidized Cys (−34% vs. −24%, Figure 2 B) and oxidized CysGly (−44% vs. −47%, Figure 2 C) for group GluReS compared to group GluS, respectively.

In all cases, the slope of the regression was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the R 2 was between 0.36 and 0.39.

4 ), and all comparisons of plasma IGF-1 between matched treatment groups of adults versus juveniles were highly significant at P < 0.0001.

These levels showed a highly significant difference (p <0.0001) in mean on comparison by using one-way ANOVA.

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there was a highly significant within-group difference among mouse fibroblasts viability at the different concentrations ( p < 0.0001) for both solutions.

Similarly, a highly significant regional difference was detected for A. phagocytophilum ( P = 0.0001), with the highest seroprevalence observed in Western (23%, CI: 14–30), Southern (22%, Cl: 14–31), and Central Norway (14%, CI: 3–36), compared to a markedly lower seroprevalence in Eastern Norway (2%, CI: 1–6) and no positive samples detected in Northern Norway (0%, CI: 0–13).

A highly significant improvement in urbanity index is instead observed in the Quattro strade district (from 7.2 to 16.7; p < 0.0001), although the score continues to be low, mainly for the inadequacy of the sidewalks and the roads equipment.

For ratings of the extent to which a speaker was being ironic, there were highly significant main effects of Statement ( F (1,32) = 87.7; p <0.0001, η p 2 = 0.72) and Occupation ( F (1,32) = 13.5; p = 0.0009, η p 2 = 0.30), as well as a significant Statement X Occupation interaction ( F (1,32) = 8.2; p = 0.007, η p 2 = 0.20), a group X occupation interaction ( F (2,64) = 4.2; p = 0.047, η p 2 = 0.11) and a significant Statement X Occupation X Group interaction ( F (3,96) = 5.0; p = 0.032, η p 2 = 0.13).

After adjustment for multiple factors, margin width was a more highly significant predictor of IBTR ( P < .0001). 22 The MP felt that, overall, the heterogeneity of the evidence between the above-reported studies did not allow for a definitive recommendation for margin widths greater than 2 mm in patients foregoing RT.

A paired t -test across languages showed that, in both cases, the difference was highly significant in the predicted direction ( p < 10 −4 ).

Based on the hypothesis that the response to radiation could associate proteins or p-sites involved in the same molecular pathway, we submitted all statistically highly significant candidates (R>0.5 or <-0,5 and P<0.0001) to STRING analysis 30 .