Excerpts

All of these differences were highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001), see also Table S2 .

Both differences were highly significant (p < .0001) [61].

The ANOVA revealed that the main effects of both the GS model and the growing season were highly significant for all traits ( p < 0.0001).

The tests of zero amplitude were highly significant ( P value < 0.0001) for every HRV variable, suggesting a significant circadian variation.

According to the results of the variation analysis, it was determined that magnetic field intensity interaction was very highly significant ( p < 0.0001) on the DPPH value and the pellicle weight.

Correlation between genetic divergence and geographic proximity Despite forming an evolutionarily coherent population, the genetic structure among localities in the larger, Amazonas basin group was not insignificant, and F ST values ranged from 0.019 and non-significant (Alto Jurua x Nhamundá) to 0.475 and highly significant ( P <0.0001; Lábrea x Região dos Lagos in Amapá) ( S2 Table and S4 Fig ).

Exclusion of that observation reduced the point estimate of β 15 by 36% (from −0.414 to −0.265), but the estimate remained highly significant (t-value = 4.93; p-value < .0001). 19 Another apparently influential observation is diabetes.

Similarly, all non-constant terms in a cubic regression of onset age on number of repeats were highly significant (p<0.0001), and the overall F-test for comparing the cubic model to a constant-age-of-onset model had a p-value of 4.4e-15.

In contrast, the coefficient of skewness (γ skew ) is negative and highly significant (−0.0021, t = −4.0245, p = 0.0001).

All long-term relationships between c a and W were linear and highly significant (Table 1 ; P < 0.0001)), indicating relative invariance in the ratio of intercellular ( c i ) to c a (as W = c a (1 − c i / c a )/1.6; see Eq.

In the ‘immediately after surgery’ subgroup, the SMD with a 95% CI is −0.76 [−1.10, −0.42], with a highly significant p -value < 0.0001, I 2 = 9%.

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant correlation between pVNT and VNT titres (Spearman’s rank correlation r = 0.86; p < 0.0001).

As shown in Table 2 , the fitness of the model was highly significant based on the high F -value (227.16) and the very low p -value ( p < 0.0001) [ 20 ].

Generalized linear mixed-effects models fitted to the complete data set and to the different combinations of CPM and type of landscape (see section 11 in S6 Text ) also showed highly significant ( P < 0.0001) two-, three-, and four-way interactions between most of the factors, in particular those involving type of landscape and detection regime.

Differences in the fraction of the brain lobe area occupied by the NE and the CB are highly significant between mbt males and their female siblings ( P < 10 −4 ) and insignificant between mbt females and wild-type brains of either sex ( Fig. 1B ).

At 24 hours, we observed a highly significant decrease in KRAS expression in those groups treated with KRAS-siRNA NP versus control cells or scramble (SC) siRNA NP treated cells (both p < 0.0001 ), with a reduction in KRAS RNA expression from 55–70% ( Figure 2A ).

The KMO test resulted in an appropriate value of 0.84, with MSA for the items varying between 0.64 and 0.92; together with a highly significant Bartlett’s test (p<0.0001), indicating that the sample was adequate for factor analysis.

Beta diversity based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity showed significantly different community compositions by parity ( p < 0.05) in the first year of infant life, with parity-based community variation being highly significant at 2 months of life ( p = 0.0001) and this significance disappearing by 24 months of life ( Figure 1 ).

As shown in Figure 2 a,b for the universal assay, we found a highly significant correlation (R 2 = 1.000, p < 0.0001 without; R 2 = 0.998, p < 0.0001 with added third-party DNA) between the numbers of HCK and axi-cel copies up to the lowest concentration.

= 21.5) was highly significant with t(116) = 5.5, p < 0.0001.

6B ), and variation between genotypes was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

This enrichment was highly significant (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.0001).

Regardless of such variability in RA patients, there was a clearly significant difference between both groups (RA mean 1.2 ± 3.18% [0–19.50%] vs. healthy control mean 0.07 ± 0.1% [0–0.59%], p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 b upper panel).

On average the lethality of social insects is 10.6 ± 17.3 mg/kg (S.D.; n = 77) compared to 52.7 ± 33.2 mg/kg (S.D.; n = 13) for solitary species, a highly significant difference (P = 0.0001, t-test).

Statistical analysis revealed the differences in prevalence between breeds were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a strong breed-associated variation in susceptibility or colonization by S. epidermidis . 3.4.