When all daily blood pressure observations were combined, the mean reductions were highly significant: P < .0001 for systolic and P > .0004 for diastolic blood pressure reductions over the 11-week period ( Figure 2 ).
Excerpts
= 1, p>0.35), but the interaction was highly significant (χ 2 = 20.86, d.f. = 1, p<0.0001).
A statistically highly significant correlation was found between changes in 99m Tc-Annexin V tumor uptake and clinical response (r 2 = 0.62; P < 0.0001).
Strong and highly significant positive correlations were observed between IVS volume and both gestational age (Pearson’s r = 0.891, p < 0.0001; Spearman’s ρ = 0.920, p < 0.0001) as well as estimated fetal weight (Pearson’s r = 0.860, p < 0.0001; Spearman’s ρ = 0.927, p < 0.0001).
In contrast, PD-1 blockade resulted in highly significant tumor growth delay ( p < 0.0001) in all mice bearing Nedd8 KO EO771 tumors (Fig. 6b ).
Notably, nulliparous women constituted a highly significant proportion of the LOPE group (77.9%) compared to HCs (32.6%) (*** p < 0.0001).
Time lag was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in PE+IOL group, while it was significant in rest of the surgeries in learning phase only and it neither impacted the surgeons comfort, nor the surgical outcome.
We found a weak (Spearman's coefficient, r = 0.4) but highly significant ( p =0.0001) correlation between the PCR and EZN staining results.
Moreover, the quadratic effects of all parameters are significant were highly significant (p < 0.0001).
identified TKIs use after BM development was highly significant for deriving survival benefit (23.6 vs. 4.41 m, p = 0.0001) ( 110 ).
The results indicated that two methods are linearly correlated and this correlation was highly significant ( r 2 = 0.9999, p < 0.0001) as shown in Fig. 1 d.
The linear regression fitted to log length and number of oysters per sack was highly significant (adjusted r 2 = 0.93, F 58 = 809, p < 0.0001), and yielded the following predictive relationship between the number of oysters in a known volume and the mean oyster length: h = 10 (−0.3537 log b + 2.8361) , where h is SH (from umbo to growth edge) in millimetres, and b is the number of oysters in a 52.85 l volume (standard Louisiana sack).
Statistical Analysis: Paired t -test analysis was used intragroup whereas unpaired t -test was used intergroup between experimental and control groups with significance at P = 0.05 and highly significant at P = 0.0001.
However, the differences in mean Iba-1-immunopositive area between 14 and 90 dpi, and between 4 and 90 dpi, were highly significant ( P < .0001 and P = .000114, respectively).
Variance between the two years was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), contributing 39.4% to the total phenotypic variance of As accumulation ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
The self-reported increase in the participants' knowledge following participation in these online lectures, as per the ratings provided by the participants before and after the lectures, was highly significant (p<0.0001) for all modules ( Fig. 6 , 7 , 8 ).
As r -equivalent and r -contrast ( Rosenthal & Rubin, 2003 ) can overestimate true population effect size ( Dunlap, Cortina, Vaslow, & Burke, 1996 ; Lakens, 2013 ), and not all studies reported sufficient information to recover sample or population standard deviations, we also computed a simple and conservative vote count test, which shows the obvious fact displayed in Figure 2 , that there is a highly significant overall serial dependence effect ( X 2 (1) = 20.8, p < 0.0001).
Statistical significance has been presented as extremely significant (****, P < 0.0001), extremely significant (***, P = 0.0001 to 0.001), very significant (**, P = 0.001 to 0.01), significant (*, P = 0.01 to 0.05), and not significant (ns, P ≥ 0.05).
1A and B , a highly significant cytotoxic effect (P<0.0001) was detected at all the tested concentrations ranges 12.5–100 μM in MM-231 cells and 1–50 μM in MM-468 cells.
This removal did not change the non-overlapping distributions of hues between positive and negative samples and this difference in distributions in highly significant (P<0.0001).
Tests for linear trend between perceived smoke exposure categories and CO were highly significant (p < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant concordance between the counts obtained by the HHAC and those by microscopy for mf densities of >5,000 (p<0.0001, r c = 0.97) or >30,000 per ml (p<0.0001, r c = 0.90).
This overall difference between the products was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.3.
This difference was highly significant in a multivariate linear regression model, p < 0.0001.
Statistical analysis showed a highly significant effect ( p < 0.0001) of fungal isolates on collar and stem lesion length, leaves, and root necrosis indices relative to untreated controls ( Table 3 ).