Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although there were no marked differences between the groups, BDNF levels tended to increase immediately after exercise in both the PLA ( p < 0.001) and GTE (no significant changes) groups as well as post 1 h of recovery in both PLA ( p < 0.05) and GTE (no significant changes) groups, compared to values recorded at rest as reflected by a highly significant time effect (F = 13.73, p < 0.0001; η 2 = 0.49).
highly significantp value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, administration of enteral nutrition led to a significantly shorter delay in peristalsis recovery compared to the unfed group with a mean duration of 2.1 (0.6) days and 3.8 (1.2) days, respectively; this difference was highly significant ( p value < 0.0001).
highly significantP=<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The lymphocytes count increased slightly in the other groups. Table 2 represents the measured data of the reactive lymphocytes in controls and x-ray technicians for different exposure time. Highly significant increasing value was observed for reactive lymphocytes (P=<0.0001) for all the groups in comparing with their control.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A quadratic regression model (Equation (4)) was developed to relate the response variable to the independent factors. (4) Y = 67.75 + 0.96 A + 2.43 B − 0.34 C + 1.32 AB − 0.20 AC + 1.38 BC − 0.80 A 2 − 3.68 B 2 − 0.25 C 2 The developed model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Table 4 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Despite age, sex, and procedural differences there was remarkable consistency in that in all 29 subjects, PAPP‐A levels in the conditioned medium of epicardial preadipocytes greatly exceeded those of subcutaneous preadipocytes, resulting in a highly significant 15‐fold difference by paired t ‐test ( P < 0.0001).
highly significantp<0·00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The proportional reductions in recurrence with dose-intense chemotherapy were similar and highly significant (p<0·0001) in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative disease and did not differ significantly by other patient or tumour characteristics.