Barely Significant

Excerpts

339,284 sentences

highly significantp<3.9e-630.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Genes involved in the Fgf/Mapk pathway are up-regulated by Fgf4 overexpression and Cic knockdown Using the stated selection criteria, 122 genes are significantly up-regulated by Fgf4 overexpression and 457 by Cic knockdown ( S1 Table ; Fig 3A , 3B , 3D and 3E ), with a highly significant (p<3.9e-63) overlap of 65 genes up-regulated in both conditions ( Fig 3B , S4 Table ).
highly significantP = 2.49e − 620.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Despite this potential for background noise in the overall associations, a number of individual genes stood out as highly significant, most notably a P450 gene (Zt09_7_00450, P = 2.49e − 62) and several major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter genes (Zt09_10_00549, P -values (Wald) = 5.57e − 19; Zt09_7_00012, P = 9.97e − 13; Zt09_7_00453, p-values (Wald) = 1.69e − 18).
highly significantP < 10 -600.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Despite moderate discrimination (C-index ∼0.67), the model achieved a 3-year Brier score of 0.21, reflecting excellent calibration, and demonstrated highly significant survival separation across predicted risk quartiles (log-rank χ 2 = 304; P < 10 -60 ).
highly significantp = 3.785E-600.0× alphaqualifiedgold
By qPCR on ChIP DNA we confirmed that CGGBP1 was indeed bound to the identified peaks (one SE motif-containing peak randomly selected from each chromosome) and that this binding was strongly and highly significantly enhanced upon serum stimulation (T-test, p = 3.785E-60; Fig. 1D ).
highly significantP = 1.5 × 10 -590.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These ROS-responsive genes overlapped with 207 ++Fe-induced and 10 ++Fe-suppressed genes, and the degree of overlap between ROS-responsive and ++Fe-inducible genes was highly significant ( P = 1.5 × 10 -59 by Fisher’s exact test), confirming that excess Fe causes oxidative stress in leaves ( Figure 6E ).
highly significantp = 8.21 e − 580.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For faces, the comparison between w -based and VGGFace-1-based encoders shows no significant difference (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = −0.2859, p = 0.78) but we found highly significant differences when comparing w -based encoders with VGGFace-3 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 16.5817, p = 8.21 e − 58) and with VGGFace-5 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 15.0820, p = 1.17 e − 48).
quite significantp = 10 −570.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The two partial correlations were both quite significant ( f versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, complex membership: Spearman partial r = 0.227, n = 4,746, p = 10 −57 ; complex membership versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, f: Spearman partial r = 0.147, n = 4,746, p = 10 −24 ), suggesting that fitness effect and protein complex membership are independently associated with the expression strategy that minimizes stochastic fluctuation.