Excerpts

The resulting model was highly significant ( R 2 = 0.85, P <0.0001) and the within-basin fitted lines were specified by T max7d-water = 3.372+0.656· T max7d-air , 4.688+0.589· T max7d-air , 4.171+0.626· T max7d-air for Aragón, Arga-Ega and Bay of Biscay basins, respectively.

This represents a highly significant overlap (odds ratio (OR) = 10.45, p < 0.0001, and OR = 18.74, p < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 2 ) which could explain some of the synergistic/additive effects of LMP1 and LMP2A observed in mouse B cells described above.

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of the genotype and the distance from the soma on the number of intersections ( p < 0.0001, F (1,4023) = 37.46 and p < 0.0001, F (26,4023) = 163.7, respectively), as well as a highly significant interaction between those two factors ( p < 0.0001, F (26,4023) = 2.488).

The result was reported as highly significant with p < 0.0001 (statistical method not specified [ 33 ]).

Comparative evaluation was done between Group I and Group II, Group I and control group, and Group II and control group, all showed highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) [Tables 1 – 3 ].

The results obtained by both techniques were coincident and the correlation between microarray data and those measured by RT-qPCR were highly significant (Pearson’s r = 0.69, P < 0.0001) in spite of the high difference in sensitivity and accuracy between these experimental procedures. 3.2.

The analysis indicated a highly significant treatment effect (F(3,12) = 40.50, P < 0.0001).

Thus, unpaired t -test reported a highly significant difference between the surface characteristics of control arch-wires and the test arch-wires ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 1 and Figure 4 ].

The difference between the sta-1(RNAi) and akir-1(RNAi) animals is highly significant (p<0.0001; one-sided log rank test).

Participants who rated their familiarity as “Poor” were significantly more likely to be classified as engaging in “Poor Practice” concerning off-label drug use, as indicated by a highly significant residual ( P < .0001).

These values exhibited highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.0001 ) between automatically-generated vs. manually-generated tracks.

This improvement was highly significant across all statistical tests: log-rank χ 2 = 42.12, p < 0.0001; test for trend χ 2 = 51.36, p < 0.0001; Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon χ 2 = 32.99, p < 0.0001.

Within the patient group, there was both a highly significant main effect of distractor expression (F(1,33) = 20.9, p < 0.0001) and a significant interaction of distractor expression by resting state group, F(1,33) = 8.6 p = 0.006.

Factor A is extremely significant ( p <0.0001) and the interactive item BC ( p =0.0029<0.01) shows the significant difference in the sterilization effect of sliced Larou.

This level of co-expression is highly significant (bootstrap test, p-value<0.0001), which means that P450 physical clusters are highly enriched in co-expressed sequences.

The CytOx kinetics measured with 1.128 mg/mL mitochondria showed that the differences between control and ADP, control and ATP, and ADP and ATP +RS ( Figure 3 A) were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001) according to a regular two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni Post hoc analysis.

Identification of Fluctuating Asymmetry Analysis of our data demonstrated a highly significant side × leaf interaction ( F 183,368 = 398.8, p < 0.0001), confirming the existence of FA in our sample and our ability to identify FA using repeated measurements of the given accuracy.

The correlation coefficient ( r 2) values range from 0.70 to 0.95 (0.70 [for professors], 0.89 [for assistant professors], and 0.95 [for associate professors]); F values are highly significant ( P < .0001) for all faculty subgroups.

control) and years were highly significant (treatment: df = 1; χ 2 = 22.18, P < 0.0001; year: df = 2; χ 2 = 824.73, P < 0.0001), while the interaction (treatment × year) was not significantly different (df = 2, χ 2 = 4.03, P = 0.1332).

(6) Y = 5.89 - 0.73 × X 1 - 0.023 × X 2 - 0.073 × X 3 + 0.13 × X 4 + 0.28 × X 1 X 2 + 0.57 × X 1 X 3 + 0.24 × X 1 X 4 - 0.035 × X 2 X 3 + 0.27 × X 2 X 4 + 0.073 × X 3 X 4 - 1.11 × X 1 2 - 1.29 × X 2 2 - 1.39 × X 3 2 - 0.97 × X 4 2 As shown in Table 3 , the Model was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001), but there was insignificant difference in the Lack of Fit ( P > 0.05), implying that this fitted quadratic polynomial model is accurate and reliable to predict the yield of PWZMLs extraction [35] .

The independent samples t-test showed a highly significant effect ( t =10.07, P < 0.0001, df =28) in APO-SUS versus APO-UNSUS rats (Fig. 1C ).

A highly significant stimulatory effect on the number of buds per polyp was observed under increasing feeding regimes in both species ( A . coerulea : F (2, 168) = 223.21, P<0.0001; A . relicta : F (1, 158) = 130.39, P<0.0001; Table 2 ).

As expected, the discriminatory ability of all five cryptic RNAs was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in the frontal cortex and amygdala in FTLD-TDP, with AUC ranging 0.79–0.98 in amygdala and 0.81–0.94 in frontal cortex (Fig.

Results A paired t -test revealed a highly significant reduction in the gingival, plaque, and oral hygiene index scores of the manual and powered groups at the first, second, and sixth weeks ( P -value < 0.0001).

The MANOVA test showed a highly significant fit [ F Wilks’ lamb d a (45,785.057) = 24.05, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.58].