The influence of lung state (Normal vs Constricted) on deposition is found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001, β = 8%), underscoring that airway narrowing indeed significantly alters deposition patterns.
Excerpts
However the overall Pearson Chi-square test for non-uniform distribution was highly significant for both the Northern hemisphere ( p < 0.0001), and Southern hemisphere ( p = 0.0001).
Statistical significance for comparisons of drug responses across different numbers of cells per spot was determined using ordinary one‐way ANOVA, with highly significant differences ( **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01) for comparisons between different groups, while “NS” indicates a nonsignificant statistical difference between the data groups.
Notably, significant suppression of proliferative activity was observed at 24 h (P < 0.05), with highly significant inhibition and negative proliferation observed at 72 h (P < 0.0001).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the reduced model was highly significant (F = 68.41, p < 0.0001), indicating adequate representation of the relationship between factors and response (Table 2 ).
It exhibited highly significant inhibition as compared to thiourea ( p < 0.0001).
By definition, there was a highly significant difference in preoperative third ventricular diameter and FOHR between group I and II ( p < 0.0001).
Results obtained on protein structures showed highly significant correlations with results obtained from literature (p < 0.0001, n = 210, four different subsets).
However, based on tumor grade, the decrease in HADHA transcript level is not significant (ns, p = 0.999) between normal and grade 1 tumors but it is highly significant between normal and grade 2 ( p < 0.0001) and 3 ( p < 0.001) tumors. 3.2.
candida for 266 MV over 266 was highly significant with p < 0.0001.
The correlation matrix shows a highly significant relationship ( r = 0.38–0.43, P < 0.0001) between all three scores (Table 4 ) indicating internal validity in scores assigned for each measure.
By 24 h, frankincense, lemon, lemongrass, patchouli, peppermint, geranium, palmarosa, and sage EOs exhibited a certain level of toxicity, indicating an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p ≤ 0.0001).
Change in AXL A highly significant correlation was found between changes in SER and changes in AXL in DISC (r=−0.70, p<0.0001) and SV (r=−0.68, p<0.0001) groups.
The Cd (ng/mL) levels in the blood of exposed workers were significantly higher than those in unexposed individuals, with mean values of 85.8 ± 0.83 versus 43.7 ± 3.07, respectively; differences were highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001).
This difference was statistically highly significant (χ 2 = 162.8681, df = 3, P < 0.0001).
The activity of AMPs and Tobramycin against preformed biofilms resulted to be similar in 5 out of 6 strains tested, causing a highly significant reduction of biofilm viability compared to the controls (biofilm not exposed; p < 0.0001), regardless of the concentrations tested (Figure 3 ).
The haplotype (07–501) showed highly significant effects (p<0.0001) on all the three non-return rates.
Specifically, the analysis of the data revealed a highly significant difference (p<.0001) in the ratings for each factor, suggesting that some factors may have a greater impact than others on the decision-making process.
Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the control group and the dropped group ( p < 0.0001), indicating the substantial contamination risk when grafts were exposed to the operating room floor.
Regional comparison (Paired t-test) In contrast, a highly significant difference was observed between the maxillary and mandibular vertical components within the same specimens ( p < 0.0001).
Differences in intra-network variability between groups The MSLR test assessing differences in the coefficients of variation of GM volume between groups showed significant group effects between psychosis controls and FEP ( χ 2(1) = 9.13, p = 0.0025), and between Con-PD and PDN ( χ 2(1) = 10.97, p < 0.001), as well as highly significant group effects between Con-PD and PDP ( χ 2(1) = 15.21, p < 0.0001), indicating a higher variability in all patient groups across all networks (Fig. 4 ).
The overall neutrality test was highly significant for Fu’s Fs (Fs = 14.407, p < 0.0001) and also in CH (Fs = 8.772, p < 0.01), suggesting population expansion or directional selection.
This highly significant difference (p<0.0001) indicates that EdU-negative mitotic cells (pH3 positive) had been in G2- or M-phase for at least 24 hours prior to fixation.
As in previous studies [37] , [38] , there was a highly significant genotype×environment interaction ( p <0.0001; Tables 2 , S4 ) across habitats for inland annual and coastal perennial parents based on the composite of two fitness traits: survival to flowering and number of flowers produced per plant.
29.37 kg/m 2 ± 0.17) than their counterparts without the disease, with both differences being highly significant ( p < 0.0001).