Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant main effects of cell line (F = 428.7, p < 0.0001), ICG concentration (F = 312.4, p < 0.0001), and time after irradiation (F = 189.6, p < 0.0001), a significant line × concentration interaction (F = 67.3, p < 0.0001) confirmed the difference in sensitivity.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
InsuTAG scores ranged from 0.55 to 132.07 across the whole participant group with a median (25 th –75 th percentile) InsuTAG score of 7.22 (4.04–11.33) There is a strong and highly significant positive correlation between InsuTAG and HOMA-IR (r = 0.86; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 ) when compared with the association between HOMA-IR and the other lipid indices, TyG index (triglycerides × glucose) (r = 0.43; p < 0.001) and TG/HDL-C ratio (r = 0.38; p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA) confirmed that the differences in healing rates between the larva-treated groups and the infected control were highly significant (F = 31.842, p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 4 ). 3.3 Microbiological analysis Bacterial load, measured as CFU/swab of P. aeruginosa , decreased significantly in all treatment groups compared to the infected control (B) ( p < 0.05).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean and median levels of uPA as determined by both ELISAs were similar. However, the mean and median PAI-1 levels assessed by the two ELISAs differed by a factor of 10, the in-house ELISA measuring values ten times lower than the ELISA with commercial reagents. The overall association between the two ELISA methods is demonstrated by the highly significant correlations between the cytosolic levels of uPA (rs = 0.85, P < 0.0001) and of PAI-1 (rs = 0.90, P < 0.0001) (Figure 1A and B).