In a prospective, observational study, the statistical comparison relation was found to be highly significant (p<0.0001), showing that low serum cholinesterase value was associated with higher mortality [ 16 ].
Excerpts
Furthermore, Tukey’s post hoc test confirmed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between these groups.
The perindopril trials demonstrated a highly significant event reduction (OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72–0.85; p < 0.0001 (Fig. 4) .
The greater genomic parallelism within than between environments is therefore highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Statistical analysis confirmed that all intergroup differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that variations in formulation composition and network density were effectively translated into distinct swelling behaviors.
Interestingly, fungal community structure was not significantly described by variance in material, while location had a relatively weak ( R = 0.129) though highly significant ( p < 0.0001) association, suggesting that variations in fungal communities that settle on materials (which have been shown to be driven largely by outdoor fungal communities 25 ) influence community structure upon experiencing wetting and high RH conditions.
Within the patient group, there was both a highly significant main effect of distractor expression (F(1,33) = 20.9, p < 0.0001) and a significant interaction of distractor expression by resting state group, F(1,33) = 8.6 p = 0.006.
The heterogeneity test between the three subgroups was highly significant (Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA test, P = 0.0001).
However, a highly significant difference ( P = 0.0001) between syngeneic and allogeneic BMDCs was seen in the tumor rejection data (Fig. 2 a, c).
A two‐way ANOVA showed highly significant effects of treatment [F(1,59) = 126.4, p < 0.0001], gene [F(5,59) = 75.40, p < 0.0001], and their interaction [F(5,59) = 74.37, p < 0.0001].
Interestingly, the correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Pearson r = 0.704), average scleral thickness being the arithmetical mean of the scleral thickness in each of the four quadrants (Fig. 2b ).
WS+CNO p = 0.3443), there was still a strong trend towards more exploratory rearing observed in stressed females that were treated with CNO (Fig. 6F , main effect of stress F 1,29 = 51.94, p < 0.0001; WS+VEH vs.
In addition, after stem abundance was accounted for, maximum D was a highly significant predictor of species contributions to biomass (F=6,218, df=1,317, P <0.0001, R 2 =0.83, Fig. 4a ) and productivity (F=2,577, df=1,254, P <0.0001, R 2 =0.67, Fig. 4b ).
While in the fixed effect model, a highly significant association was observed (OR= 1.67, 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.09, p<0.0001).
Delay was most frequent in the poorest households (62.9 %) and showed a significant trend: the higher the wealth level, the shorter the delay (p < 0.0001).
Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05, and highly significant was defined as p < 0.0001.
Finally, Spearman correlation tests between the 25(OH)D concentration values and the absolute and percentage root mean square precision errors (RMSCV and RMSCV%) were performed, showing the highly significant correlation, with r = 0.44 for the absolute root mean square precision error (RMSCV; p < 0.0001) but not for the root mean square precision error expressed in percentages (RMSCV%; r = −0.14; p = 0.08). 4.
The chi‐square test result indicates a highly significant association between this perception and the participants’ responses ( χ 2 = 32.202, p = 0.0001), as shown in Table 2 .
A highly significant in- crease in the number of tumors was ob- tained with the positive asbestos controls (p<0.0001) (Table 3).
Detection of recombination, using the pairwise homoplasy index test (PHI-test), was marginally significant in the HCV Sanger data set ( P = 0.043), and highly significant in the HIV-1 data set ( P < 0.0001).
In contrast, 12 of the 43 (B6× Ads )F 2 progeny exhibited the white-spotting phenotype, showing a highly significant deviation from the expected 2:1 ratio for a simple autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with homozygous embryonic lethality (χ 2 =29.07, P <0.0001).
A highly significant correlation (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001) between the LAST and the short version of the Token Test indicated good external validity of the scale.
Performing surgery, whether or not they had an MRI &/or biopsy, showed a highly significant ( P < .0001 ) increase in the time taken for a patient to be referred to the ROH.
A 3 × 3 within participants ANOVA of list type and the serial position of the critical word, revealed a highly significant main effect of list type: F (2, 106) = 20.458, MSe = 0.008235, p < 0.0001, highly significant main effect of critical word serial position: F (2, 106) = 23.926, MSe = 0.006552, p < 0.0001, and most importantly, a highly significant interaction between the two factors: F (4, 212) = 5.880, MSe = 0.005438, p < 0.0001.
C comparisons (comparing 164 values) gave a low, but highly significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.37, P < 0.0001) between the data obtained by the Affymetrix and PCR arrays.