Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant difference was observed between the untreated cells and the positive control (**** = P <0.0001), which served as the reference for 100% cytotoxicity, validating the assay and enabling data normalization.
nominally significantP = 1.0 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
Among the 12 loci associated with MG in the European meta GWAS, we identified nominally significant associations with same directional effects in the CTLA4 at 2q33 (rs231779, OR = 1.17, P = 1.0 × 10 −4 ), FAM76B at chromosome 11q21 (rs4409785, OR = 1.17, P = 0.030), and TNFRSF11A regions at 18q21 (rs7239261, OR = 1.14, P = 1.3 × 10 −3 ) in Japanese (Supplementary Table 2 ).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The onset of TAO within 2 years after the treatment with RAI and the titer of TSHR-Abs The relation between the onset of orbitopathy symptoms in patients with GD during a two-year of follow-up after a therapeutic dose of 131 I and the titer of TSHR-Abs in the serum was highly significant ( P <0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Given the highly significant negative correlations between FAI FAT and %F in both sexes of the examined sample (males: r = − 0.5013; females: r = − 0.3564; p < 0.0001), we performed a regression analysis identifying body misperception for subjects with FAI FAT ≥ 2 or ≤ − 2 (Figs. 1 and 2 ) in accordance with previous studies [ 41 , 42 ] on the interpretation of perceived figure (Feel figure) and actual anthropometric values.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results are statistically highly significant WOMAC osteoarthritis index at V1: (4.24 ± 1.94/6.19 ± 1.79; p < 0.0001, t test and Wilcoxon test), not significant at V2: p = 0.1636, highly significant at V3: p = 0.0009, and significant at V4: p = 0.0123 (Fig. 4 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference between Control and Supplemented group was overall highly significant (effect of supplement, P < 0.0001), with a significant interaction with time (P < 0.0001) as the effects were mostly measured from d42 and even stronger at d49 and d56 (mean concentration were for Control and Supplemented group respectively, of 2.9 ± 0.2, vs 7.0 ± 0.4 Log 10 copies of 16S rDNA/g of rumen content at d49 and of 2.6 ± 0.3 vs 7.7 ± 0.3 Log 10 copies of 16S rDNA/g of rumen content at d56).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was no significant change in the expression of pMx-MGT Ang II cells (676.3 ± 421.3 pixels/cell; Figure 4 C,F) and pMx-MGT ET-1 cells (675.5 ± 409.1 pixels/cell; Figure 4 D,F), but a highly significant upregulation of MCP-1 was measured in the Isl1 + Sca1 + ckit + pCPCs stimulated with Ang II (1541.0 ± 880.9 pixels/cell, p = 0.0001; Figure 4 E,F). 3.4.