Excerpts

Overall, differences in species richness between elevational zones <2000 m were highly significant (ANOVA, F = 244.04, P <0.0001).

Finally, we compared expansion indices between cerebellum and BA9, exhibiting low and high instability respectively, from eight additional HD individuals with repeat lengths from 40 to 48 CAGs and found a highly significant correlation ( R 2 = 0.93, P < 0.0001) between the two measures ( Fig. 6C ).

Statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.0001).

Across all drug groups, the difference between actual estimate and chance was highly significant (chi-square = 337, 4 df, r = 0.37, both P < 0.0001).

In the comparison between SAMS patients and the control group, we observed a significant difference ( P < 0.05) in BUN, fasting blood glucose, and triglycerides and a highly significant difference in total cholesterol, creatinine, CPK, CRP, and 25OH-vitamin D serum levels ( P < 0.0001) (Tables 2 and 3 ).

All models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The CIF curves showed a highly significant difference among the novel N staging groups, with a P-value of <0.0001, indicating statistically significant differences in the cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death across groups ( figure 5A ).

Moreover, by taking into account the normal and intestinal metaplasia tissue to examine TF expression along the gastric MACS, the increasing trend was shown to be highly significant in both approaches; P <0.0001 by JTOM for both I s and I m scales ( Figure 2 ).

The Mann-Kendall trend test showed an increasing trend between the top-cited articles’ citation density and their published time ( P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 ).

The proportional difference is highly significant (χ 2 (d.f. = 1) = 18.18, P < 0.0001) and is line with other national and international findings that COVID-19-associated death is more likely in older men than older women.

The difference between circulating cfMTB-DNA amount quantified in the ‘Possible’ ATB group versus combined group of ‘Definite and Probable’ ATB was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The level of significance was set at p = 0.05 ( p ≤ 0.05—significant, p ≤ 0.01—highly significant, p ≤ 0.0001—very highly significant).

There was a markedly significant difference in the median PCT level between bacteria-infected subgroup A (0.24 ng/mL) and TF subgroup A (0.05 ng/mL) ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2(a) ).

For both samples, correlation was highly significant (sample 2: r s = 0.99, P > 0.0001; sample 3: r s = 0.99; P < 0.0001).

The correlation between bone resorption of young bone or aged bone and bone formation was highly significant in patients +BM and −BM ( P < 0.0001).

Indeed, there was a highly significant correlation among hair δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of all individual hair observations ( r = 0.475, n = 684, P < 0.0001), consistent with the concept that proteins contributing to an individual’s diet were largely a mixture of just two primary sources: C 3 -plant protein and C 4 -derived animal protein.

Again, the mean mPlI was calculated at 0.79 ± 0.10 at 3 months in the present study, which later decreased to 0.73 ± 0.20 at 6 months and 0.54 ± 0.18 at 9 months of evaluation, respectively, with the results being statistically significant when compared between sixth and ninth months ( P = 0.0050), whereas statistically highly significant when compared between third and ninth months ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 2 ].

CT exposure resulted in a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increase of FPC in all four individuals with an average DSB foci number of 0.66 ± 0.08 for PCCT and 0.56 ± 0.067 for conventional CT (Fig. 2 ), in addition to a significant difference among both CT techniques ( p < 0.004).

Combining the pollinator catches for each sampling week showed a highly significant difference (F 6, 890 = 29.4, p < 0.0001) among the sampling weeks, with a steady increase from the first sampling week (25.25 ± 3.79) through the fifth week, with the highest peak occurring on week six (154.75 ± 19.90) ( Figure 3 ).

The regression model was highly significant ( F = 41.35, p < 0.0001), whereas the lack-of-fit was statistically insignificant, demonstrating that the model adequately described the experimental results.

In a retrospective multicenter study, the correlation between SWV values and histological fibrosis was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), even if a large overlap of values occurred in the stages of 2 or below, with only F ≥ 2 and cirrhosis being excluded with great certainty [ 39 ].

The median score in the P − group was 20.7 [14.2–28.1] compared to 47.9 [39.1–56.8] in the P + group, a difference that was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, p < .0001).

A highly significant (p < 0.0001) increase in colony size was seen under co-culture conditions for all cell lines tested (Figure 3C ).

The blood glucose level estimation on the third day after streptozotocin (STZ) administration for the confirmation of induction of diabetes in the experimental animal groups revealed a highly significant (p<0.0001) increase in the blood glucose level (21.26 to 22.81 mmol/L) of all experimental groups except nondiabetic control ((6.53±0.2) mmol/L) and vehicle control ((6.66±0.15) mmol/L) groups.

This response rate to peptide 4 was highly significant, with p < 0.0001.