Fig 6A shows the results of a logistic regression show a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) positive correlation between T barrel and the escape probability ε of descended tabanids ( S11 Table ).
Excerpts
Results of multivariate analyses showed highly significant effects of flow [Pillai’s V = 0.579; F(3,255) = 116.9, P<0.0001] and of speed [Pillai’s V = 0.367; F(12,771) = 8.95, P<0.0001].
digitata -based AgNPs exhibited a highly significant impact against Alternaria sp, S. sclerotiorum, F. venenatum , and F. equiseti ( P < 0.0001).
ANOVA results ( Supplementary material 1 , Table S5 ) indicated that the model was highly significant (P < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not significant (P = 0.102 > 0.05), supporting good model adequacy within the studied region.
Results There was a highly significant fall in mean FeNO of 51.7% over 2 weeks ( p < 0.0001) accompanied by significant improvements in mean FEV 1 , ACQ6 and ASX scores.
The difference of neutralizing antibody titers between cases and controls was statistically highly significant ( t test, P < .0001).
A significant increase in IgG immune response was observed in infected mice groups; specifically, the wild-type mice exhibited highly significant serum IgG response (>1,000-fold) to P. gingivalis ( P < 0.0001) and T. forsythia ( P < 0.0001), TLR2 -/- and TLR4 -/- mice showed significant IgG response to F. nucleatum ( P < 0.0001) and P. gingivalis ( P < 0.0001) (>90-fold), and TLR4 -/- mice had a robust level of IgG response to P. gingivalis ( P < 0.01) (>700-fold) ( Fig. 1D1–3 ).
These results were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared to MT.
The results showed highly significant correlations between LAC and SUV ( r = 0.586, p < 0.0001) and suggest further investigation of this type of approach for bone density measurement.
ANOVA results showed a highly significant effect of treatment (F = 11.8, p<0.0001) as well as a significant effect of region (p = 0.0069) ( Fig 4B ).
Gender-wise, 126 (49.2%) females were in class V compared to 31 (12.1%) males, and this difference was highly significant (χ2 = 54.82, p < 0.0001) (Table 1 ).
Highly significant nucleotide compositional bias ( P > .0001) is likely to affect the choice of codon and A/U is expected to occur most frequently at the third codon position in the MERS-CoV genes.
An increasing trend was observed among persons less than 50 years, with rates at 2.3 per 100,000 (APC = 2.7; p < 0.0001) for persons <40 years, and 22.5 per 100,000 (APC = 1.7; p < 0.001) for those between 40 and 49 years.
For VEGF, a highly significant effect of Time was found ( p < 0.0001), while the effects of Lactation Phase ( p = 0.1173) and the interaction ( p = 0.4497) were not significant.
IHC H‐scores (Figure 4D ) revealed a highly significant difference between WT and Vasn −/− mice ( p < 0.0001).
The main effect of domain was not significant (F(1,156) = 0.44, p = 0.51, partial_eta 2 = 0.0027), but the main effect of method was highly significant (F(1,156) = 57.51, p<0.0001, partial_eta 2 = 0.2610), and the 2x2 interaction also came out significant (F(1,156) = 5.9, p = 0.0163, partial_eta 2 = 0.0349).
Comparing the parameter values of the models with exponential relationship for capture rates, there is a clear trend from a highly significant negative relationship for the uncorrected densities (ε a = −0.0103, SE = 0.0014, p < 0.0001), a shallower slope with lower significance for the one-sided correction (ε a = −0.0032, SE = 0.0014, p = 0.020) to a non-significant (constant) relationship under the two-sided correction (ε a = −0.0016, SE = 0.0014, p = 0.267 in the second best model fitting; see Table 2 for parameter estimates for the best fitting models, respectively).
Siebert et al , 16 reported a highly significant difference in tibiofemoral alignment between the two groups (RA: 1/70, 1.4% [4° deviation from planned angle] vs CM: 18/52, 35% [deviation >3°- 7°]; p<0.0001).
All D&C procedures required anesthesia (125/125, 100%), while none of the Pipelle biopsies did (0/125, 0%), a highly significant difference (p<0.0001, Fisher’s exact test).
The influence of DSCC on the variation in milk components was always highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas it was not significant for milk yield and lactose.
The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not significant ( p = 0.9735), and the R 2 value was 0.9323, indicating that the model had good fitting and predictive ability.
The mean parasite densities of false negatives and true positives were 898/μl and 5,215/μl and this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Quality of life In the ITT set, there was a 37.5% improvement in the mean EQ-5D score (an increase of 0.2 ± 0.4) from baseline to week 8, which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 3A ).
The model explained 77.8% of the total variation in the observed number of eggs per snail which was highly significant (PROC NLIN: F 3,729 = 853.8; P < 0.0001).
In all areas that were analyzed (CA1, CA3, hilus, and dentate gyrus), there was a highly significant main effect for group ( p < 0.0001 for all areas) but not for treatment (CA3: p = 0.2708; CA1: p = 0.6038; dentate gyrus: p = 0.6610; hilus: p = 0.8269).