Excerpts

These criteria were highly significant in the distinction between patients according to disease recurrence (MC p = 0.001, UTS criteria p < 0.001, Asan criteria p < 0.001, AFP score p = 0.009).

Based on the median test, a highly significant statistical difference was observed on the level of χ 2 = 177151, *** P < 0.001 between individual scopes of activities not considered in the original TISS-28 scale.

The difference in the platelet count response between the groups with and without concurrent plasma exchange was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001 by Fisher's exact test). 4.

Assessment of model fit The results of the Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients were highly significant (all respondents’ model: χ2 (34) = 988.1; p < .001; physical wellness’ model: χ2 (36) = 255.1; p < .001; psychological and emotional wellness’ model: χ2 (37) = 233.7; p < .001; social wellness’ model: χ2 (36) = 551.8; p < .001; and self-rated wellness’ model: χ2 (36) = 305.2; p < .001), indicating that the final model in each analysis is significantly better than the unadjusted baseline model.

In 53 (62.4%) of 85 knees with mild to moderate OA on AP-radiographs (K/L-score ≤ 3), the lateral femorotibial minJSW on the PA-flexed view (2.0 mm, SD 1.1) decreased highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the AP view (0.1 mm) and resulted in an increased K/L-score of 4 (Fig. 1 ).

Regarding laboratory findings, haemoglobin levels were different, with a decreasing trend towards the symptomatic bronchiectasis group (14.61 g·dL −1 versus 14.44 g·dL −1 versus 14.38 g·dL −1 , p<0.001), whereas CRP levels were relatively higher in the symptomatic bronchiectasis group than in the other groups (0.11 mg·dL −1 versus 0.11 mg·dL −1 versus 0.16 mg·dL −1 , p<0.001).

Differences between the groups with and without pravastatin (about 1 mmol/l) were highly significant throughout the treatment period (P<0.001).

Statistical significance was set at P < 0,05; results were considered statistically highly significant if p < 0,001.

Twenty-two genetic correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Excluding workers with more than 1280 μg/m 3 years produces a highly significant ( p < 0.001) model with an E-R slope of 4.06 (2.11–7.83) per 1000 μg/m 3 years (or 1.0014), and is the only significant model after exclusion of high exposures and workers with <5-years tenure.

The Partitions of Pearson’s Chi-squared test shows highly significant overall differences between need and use (p-value < 0.001) and further significant differences in location in the SES distribution between need and use (p-value < 0.001).

Overall the association was highly significant (Kruskal Wallis test: P < 0.001).

By POD70, cochlear ablation resulted in a highly significant (ANOVA, p<0.001) areal reduction of 0.66 on the affected side, or a shrinkage by 34%.

IgG3 alone or in combination with IgG1 has increased potential to cause in vivo hemolysis and highly significant ( p < 0.001) abnormal values of hemolytic laboratory analytes (hemoglobin, bilirubin and LDH).

One study showed that the use of the Hepcon device resulted in a highly significant reduction in the total protamine dose compared to ACT-based dosing (mean protamine dose: 14.190 IU vs 24.777 IU; P < 0.001) and total blood loss (mean blood loss: 804 ml vs 1416 ml; P < 0.001) [ 495 ].

SiADIPOQ also had a highly significant up-regulation effect on the mRNA level of FATP4 ( P < 0.001) ( Figure D).

Additional analysis of the data using two-sample t tests for each of the four census years (see Section 3), also confirmed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference between the asset wealth (SEP) levels of the two sets of households that was constant for the entire period.

Firstly, the heterogeneity was moderately significant in the pooled HRs of OS (I 2 = 72.8%, P < 0.001) and mildly significant for PFS (I 2 = 72%, P = 0.185).

In our samples from Afghanistan, the Mediterranean 563T mutation was almost exclusively associated with the CT haplotype (36/38 cases) with only two TC individuals detected; compared to the C563 (wild-type) population this was a highly significant difference (Fisher’s exact p<0.001).

The effect was highly significant, M r = .37, Z = 3.26, p < .001, two-tailed, showing that men evaluated the scent of sexually aroused women as more attractive than non-sexually aroused women across all three experiments (see Table 1 ).

GLM on Log-transformed data showed that week of sampling was highly significant (F 21;209 = 6.0; p < 0.001 ***) as well as the intra-treatment variability (F 3;209 = 4.5; p = 0.004 **), confirming that varroa mite infestation was irregularly but equally distributed among exposure and control sites, depending on the season (“date” factor) and on the single-hive history (“hive” factor).

The infection intensity of coccidia had a highly significant effect on the infection intensity of nematodes ( P < 0.001, Fig 4-1 ), exhibiting a positive correlation coefficient of 0.187 ( P < 0.001).

A repeated-measures ANOVA on mean reaction times with context (interleaved, blocked) and target location (left, right) as within-subject factors revealed a highly significant main effect of context ( F (1,17) = 248.257, p <.001), no effect of target location ( F (1,17) = 0.197, p = .663), and no interaction ( F (1,17) = 0.007, p = .933).

Strikingly, we found differential expression for 21 of 22 genes in at least one condition (p value <0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) and highly significant differential expression for 16 of 22 (p value <0.001).

ns indicates not significant (p>0.05); ** indicates very significant (p-value 0.001 to 0.01); *** indicates extremely significant (p<0.001).