The progressive nature of the IOP reduction was confirmed by a linear mixed-effects model with a random intercept for patient (n = 232 observations from 29 patient clusters): all time main effects were highly significant (Day 30 vs. baseline β = −6.12, 95% CI −6.93 to −5.30, p < 0.001; Day 90 β = −7.56, 95% CI −8.37 to −6.74, p < 0.001; Day 180 β = −8.56, 95% CI −9.37 to −7.74, p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The levels of SOD in the Myricetin group remained significantly higher ( p < 0.01), and the Valproic Acid group maintained a highly significant elevation in SOD activity ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 10 ).
The depression of the clay slope compared to the control slope was statistically and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
ALP also showed a highly significant increase in the severe group ( p < 0.001).
Statistical Modeling and Interaction Effects The linear mixed-effects model (LMM) revealed a highly significant interaction between material type and sterilization status ( p < 0.001).
Percentage of neutrophils and monocytes having produced hydrogen peroxide Comparing all data of the observed time period, there was a highly significant difference among lipid emulsions for each concentration used in the present study (p < 0.001), Figure 2 .
However, chemotherapy caused an extremely significant decrease in E2, conversely, caused an extremely significant increase in FSH as compared with baseline (p<0.001).
A highly significant variation (p<0.001) was obtained among accessions for SY ( Supplementary Table S4 ).
The subsequent PERMANOVA confirmed very strong, highly significant metabolic shifts comparing predose and postdose metabolomics signatures with F = 20.665, R 2 = 0.408, p = 0.001 for visit 2 and with F = 16.084, R 2 = 0.349, p = 0.001 for visit 1, based on 999 permutations in both analysis cases.
A significant trend in the association between the degree of infertility (fertile, uRPL and UI) and the HSCORE level (negative, medium and high) was found ( P < 0.001; x 2 for trend).
HDLC and TG showed the most robust associations, remaining highly significant across all models (HDLC Q4 OR = 0.15, TG Q4 OR = 5.53 in Model 3, both P < .001), indicating independence from demographic, lifestyle, and metabolic confounders.
At Site 3 [anterior], the difference between Group 1 and Group 7 was statistically highly significant [ p < 0.001], and Group 7 and Group 2 were statistically significant [ p = 0.001].
There was a highly significant difference between mean percentage of dye penetration across all the groups, with P values <0.001 and F = 3242.
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), while p < 0.01 was regarded as highly significant (**) and (***) designated as p < 0.001.
Results Postnatal immune development in EPT infants The PLS‐DA model of anti‐CD3/CD28‐induced cytokine and chemokine levels was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in separating EPT at different time points, even if some overlapping could be seen between groups (Figure 1b ).
This is highly significant according to an exact binomial test ( p < 0.001).
Despite these differences, the main effect of modulation rate, assessed by fitting a linear mixed model (LMM) with modulation rate as a continuous variable and a random intercept for each subject, was highly significant ( χ 2 (1) = 17.04, p < 0.001, likelihood-ratio test).
Linear Regression Models with Apathy Derived Factors as Dependent Variables As shown in Table 5 , the regression model derived using the first apathy factor, “cognitive behavioral” as the dependent variable, was highly significant ( P < 0.001) and 48% of the variance in this factor was accounted for by anxiety (lower levels), depression (higher levels), and attentional control (more impaired).
In the fully adjusted model, molecular subtype remained a highly significant independent predictor of OS ( Figure 6 G; supplemental Table 2 ; overall P < .001).
Even at lower concentrations of NT‐3 (10, 25, or 50 ng/ml), there was a highly significant increase in the percentage of OPCs extending processes at all time points (Figure 4e ; Table 4 ; p ≤ 0.001).
On assessment of the unadjusted associations we selected 35 which were highly significant (P<0.001).
With the exception of digit span forward ( p = 0.2), all the primary and secondary outcomes were highly significant (all p < 0.001). 4.
As none of the matched sets had as much overlap as our height GWAS loci, the enrichment we observed for the height GWAS data is highly significant (p<0.001; z-score: 11.88) ( Figure 3c ).
test of the statistical significance of the allele frequency divergence between the two populations, were highly significant (p < 0.001).
A highly significant association (p<0.001) was found between risk factors and the categories of health professions for tobacco use, alcohol intake, added salt intake and physical inactivity.