Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
cyanus seed number was lower in the two heated treatments relative to the two unheated ones in both years (precipitation had no effect in either additional water treatment); this was highly significant in 2014 (LRT = 30.125, p < 0.001) but non-significant in 2015 ( Table 1 , Figure 4A , and Supplementary Table 6 ).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
xyvitamin D and inflammatory marker levels Results NeP component 32 (21 [20.6%]; clearly NeP and 11 [10.8%]; mixed NeP) was present in patients with AS Compared to those without NeP, they had significantly higher VAS and BASDAI scores (p=0.022 and 0.003, respectively) In addition, there was a highly significant difference of frequency of fibromyalgia between patients with and without NeP (50.0% vs 5.7%, p<0.001) Vitamin D status and medication use were comparable for patients with and without NeP Logistic regression analysis revealed that only fibromyalgia was a significant predictor of NeP Conclusion This stud
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A interaction LM including species as a factor with a power term of 0.55 for instream distance captured well the saturating response, with instream distance, species, and their interaction being highly significant (Figure 5 ; F 3,2735 = 1094.0; p < .001; R 2 adj = 0.55). 3.2 Simulation – data comparison The stochastic simulations assuming a stepwise mutation model resulted in highly differentiated spatial patterns of population genetic diversity depending on the set of parameter values used (Figure 3 , Figure S5 and Figure S6 ).
highly significantP < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although there were trends for CMV seroprevalence to be higher for patients with COVID-19 versus healthy controls ( P = .07) and for recovered patients versus healthy controls ( P = .08), the difference in CMV seropositivity between hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and nonhospitalized and recovered patients with mild COVID-19 was highly significant ( P < .001) ( Figure 3A ).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Using conventional benchmarks (≥ 0.90 = excellent; 0.75–0.90 = good), these findings support excellent stability for: Concern About Aversive Consequences, Sensory-Based Avoidance, and Severity of Impact, and good stability for Lack of Interest; all tests were highly significant ( p < .001).
marginally significantp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
A main effect of session was also significant or marginally significant (cooling, Pz: F(4,72) = 5.4, p < 0.001, T3: F(4,72) = 2.9, p = 0.028, T4: F(4,72) = 5.0, p = 0.0013; heating, Pz: F(4,72) = 2.2, p = 0.076, T3: F(4,72) = 4.2, p = 0.0040, T4: F(4,72) = 7.1, p < 0.001).