Males who reported more than one sexual dysfunction as opposed to none were more likely to report an unintended pregnancy (19% versus 7% p = 0.01); this association was highly significant when considering sexual dysfunction hindering sexuality (37% versus 7%, p <0.001).
Excerpts
The spatial error parameter was high and highly significant (λ = 0.92, p < 0.001; Table 3 ), indicating strong spatial structure in the error term.
This difference was highly significant ( V = 1.5, p < 0.001, n = 55).
In contrast, sandblasting presented a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), characterized by a considerable increase in cohesive–material failures across all adhesive systems. 3.3.
Arsenic (As) Levels The sampling station had a highly significant effect on As levels (F = 42.090, p < 0.001), while sex also exerted a significant influence (F = 10.965, p = 0.004).
This analysis confirmed the highly significant difference in the frequency of K65R among subtype C patients compared with subtype B patients (adjusted OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.55–2.62, P < 0.001).
The interaction between phenotype and PEEP strategy was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The ACs measured by the two observers showed a highly significant Spearman’s rank correlation with a coefficient of 0.74 (95%-CI 0.48 to 0.88, p < 0.001) and a very good ICC of 0.92. 2) Inter-Observer Agreement of the HRI In healthy individuals, the mean difference of calculated HRI-values was 0.17 (95%-CI 0.11-0.22), which is 14% of the mean (95%-CI 10-18.7%).
A p -value of <0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference ( * ), p < 0.01 was considered a moderately significant difference ( ** ), and p < 0.001 was considered a highly significant difference ( *** ).
The results showed that in all three performances, the correlation, ρ (rho) value, between the audience participants was greater and significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.001) during scene 4 of part 2 “You/We” when also their attention was increased (Table 4 ).
Permutation ANOVA confirmed that the overall model was highly significant (F = 23.067, p < 0.001).
Highly significant increases ( p < 0.001) in oestrus duration in queens in Treatments B, C and E, i.e., 27.1, 24.2 and 19.2 days, respectively, out of a maximum of 30 days, were all increased compared to the pre-treatment mean of 2.9 days and above the generally accepted mean of 7 days (range of 2 to 9 days) [ 18 , 19 ].
The maximum reduction of 32 mg/L (93.30%) was observed after 20 days that showed highly significant treatment ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 2(c) ).
Waist-to-height ratio demonstrated the steepest gradient, ranging from 0.41 ± 0.04 in the underweight category to 0.60 ± 0.06 in the obese category, again with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
The association between treatment allocation and recovery trajectory was statistically large and highly significant (χ 2 (2) = 36.25, p < 0.001; Cramer’s V = 0.63).
Furthermore, the Pearson correlation analysis revealed highly significant (p<0.001) positive correlations of grain yield per plant with the yield components, 100 seed weight, number of seeds per plant, number of seeds per pod, and number of pods per plant at Sékou, Savè and across environments ( Table 5 ).
There was high genetic differentiation among archipelagos for all species, as indicated by highly significant pairwise F ST values between geographic regions ( p < 0.001, Table 2 ).
According to our study, there was highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in postoperative pain from 1 st , 3 rd , and 7 th day with piezotome when compared to conventional rotary instruments.
Results In 1693 RA patients mean DAS28 scores fell from 2005 to 15 by 11% from 4.08 (95% CI: 3.91, 4.25) in 2005 to 3.64 (3.34, 3.78); these falls were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Although the Asian group contains only eight samples, the comparison with white patients is extremely significant ( p < 0.001).
This is indicated by the results of the correlation analysis (which was carried out after converting all scores into z-scores to standardize the measures), according to which Pearson’s r coefficient was found to be 0.691, a highly significant value ( p < 0.001), and it is also confirmed, as previously mentioned in the methodological section, by PCA and EFA that showed that all items load optimally on a single factor, we labeled ‘total care burden’. 3.2.2.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed a highly significant difference across groups ( p < 0.001).
However there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) improvement of memory in 400 mg group as compared to 200 mg in a same way as in EPM model.
Mental health literacy and help-seeking intentions MHLS had a slightly significant positive correlation with GHSQ ( r = 0.195; P < .001), which is consistent with the results of previous studies.
As expected, based on our previous findings, 4 , 14) there was a highly significant difference in the total and factor scores among the diagnostic groups, F=16.079, p <0.001 for the total score, F=2.966, p =0.019 for the impulsivity factor, F= 23.846, p <0.001 for the inattention factor, and F=20.439, p <0.001 for the mood instability factor.