offline version of the HGSHS was highly significant, but only in a low to moderate range [ r (100) = 0.44, p < 0.001, see Figure 2E ].
Excerpts
Both sine and cosine terms were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating strong seasonal fluctuations in mosquito density, with reductions corresponding to specific phases of the year.
On this basis, an independent samples t-test was conducted to compare the differences between the two groups, and p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference (*), p < 0.01 indicated a highly significant difference (**), p < 0.001 indicated an extremely significant difference (***), and < 0.0001 indicated an extremely significant difference (****). 3.
The correlations between the CCI and measures of posttraumatic stress (Table 3 ) were all moderately high ( r = .32-.54) and highly significant ( p < .001).
Specifically, in presence of a YST, MeSa had a highly significant effect on the disturbance of whiteflies after 2 h ( F 1,29 = 14.67, P < 0.001) and also after 24 h ( F 1,29 = 34.61, P < 0.001).
This result was confirmed by the ML-HKA test [25] , for which a model allowing selection for PDS showed highly significant improvement to the likelihood compared with the neutral model (χ 2 = 19.62, df = 1, P <0.001).
solani cells was significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05) and an extremely significant difference (P < 0.001).
Survivors demonstrated an increasing trend of GZMB in CD4+ (8.36%–9.61%, p = 0.001) and CD8+ T cells (38.2%–44.8%, p = 0.005) with elevated IL‐2 production in CD4+ T cells (4.13% versus 5.46%, p = 0.005).
Although both the intervention and control groups showed a decreasing trend in sleep latency at posttest (intervention: adjusted mean difference −27.80 minutes/day, 95% CI −33.07 to −22.53, P <.001; control: −26.05 minutes/day, 95% CI −31.22 to −20.89, P <.001) and follow-up (intervention: −26.63 minutes/day, 95% CI −32.05 to −21.20, P <.001; control: −18.43 minutes/day, 9
One-way ANOVA also verified highly significant differences among groups at each time point (P < 0.001).
Intraventricular extension was present in 16 patients (40%), and mortality in this subgroup was 75%, also showing a highly significant association with poor outcomes ( P < 0.001) (Tables 6 - 7 ).
Statistical analysis Difference between groups was analyzed by applying the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test (P < 0.05 as significant, P < 0.01 as highly significant, P < 0.001 as very highly significant).
MAS was independently associated with the need for resuscitation (OR = 0.038), oxygen therapy (OR = 0.009), and shock (OR = 0.023), all with highly significant p-values (p < 0.001), indicating the severe initial compromise these neonates face.
The association was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
When we considered genotypes nested within sets, the genotypic differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all the three traits (Table 2 ).
The Friedman test indicated highly significant differences in valence scores across the conditions ( χ 2 (2) = 18.38, p < 0.001).
On the first day after surgery a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease by 33.68% to 27.61 ± 12.55 μmol/L at T2 ( Figure 2 ) was observed.
All these differences were highly significant (McNemar’s chi-square test p < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively).
The final multivariate logistic regression model ( table 3 ), including a random effect to account for dependence among samples collected in the same study region, found a highly significant ( p < 0.001) association between prevalence and housing unit density, with 26% ( p < 0.001) increase in infection odds associated with a doubling of housing unit density.
For the target nodules with open bronchi, a significant trend between hemoptysis and OBU index ( p < 0.001) was observed.
Examination of the exact location of each mosquito captured on the top surface of the net (Figure 4 ) showed that nearly 70% of the mosquitoes caught on this surface were within a 90 × 90 cm area over the head and chest, a distribution pattern that was highly significant (χ 2 = 119.1, 99.3, 164.5 for each experiment respectively; p < 0.001).
Here, we demonstrate significant differences with highly significant P values ( P <.001) using the Kruskal-Wallis test for survey sum scores (weighted and nonweighted) and chi-square test for categorical choice for a favorite system.
Seventy confirmed breast carcinoma samples were analysed for ER using both techniques with a statistically highly significant concordance (P < 0.001) between the two methods.
IgG3 alone or in combination with IgG1 has increased potential to cause in vivo hemolysis and highly significant ( p < 0.001) abnormal values of hemolytic laboratory analytes (hemoglobin, bilirubin and LDH).
Diabetes shows a significant trend (OR = 1.607, P < .001), indicating that individuals with diabetes have a 1.607 times higher risk of intestinal obstruction compared to those without diabetes.