Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) had a p value of 0.03, gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) and albumin (ALB) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001), and direct bilirubin (DBIL) showed notable differences ( p = 0.017).
Excerpts
Moreover, this increase in ictal compared to interictal synchronicity remained highly significant even in the subset of Purkinje cell pairs that showed a significant cross-correlation Z-score at a lag of 0 ms ( p < 0.001, Table 6 ).
This difference in ShW rate between states was highly significant ( p value < 0.001) when pooling across animals and nights (Fig. 3l , 14,999 sleep cycles from 50 nights in 9 animals, t -test, p value = 1.5e −22 ).
When we included all species in the model, predicted establishment was highly significant ( t = 3.98, p < .001) with no differences between sites ( t = −0.23, p = .816) and an adjusted R 2 of .40 (Figure 8 ).
However, the interaction of time by treatment group (Table 1 ) was highly significant ( F = 12.30, p < .001).
Group differences in emotional balance and psychological alienation were examined using Kruskal–Wallis tests, which revealed highly significant differences across the three groups (χ 2 = 168.93, df = 2, p < 0.001; χ 2 = 163.03, df = 2, p < 0.001, respectively).
Firstly, the main interaction between value type and value level was highly significant, F (2,108) = 22.3, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.292.
Although the former variability is assumed to be known and estimated by the standard error reported for each study, the latter (heterogeneity) was estimated from the model and found to be highly significant [ Q = 308.14 (14 df), p < 0.001].
high) revealed highly significant differences among the edible and inedible food categories ( p < 0.001) as well as interacting effects with low and high intensity ( p < 0.001) for pleasantness and edibility ratings.
When controlling for variables including gender, age, and BMI, the relationship between self-reported and measured data for each outcome measure remained highly significant ( P< .001).
The face temperature continued to increase after using both, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between conditions of wearing one or not doing it.
* indicates a significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** indicates a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01), and *** indicates an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001).
Results of Laboratory Parameters of the Study Participants ( Table 1 ) There was a highly significant increase in absolute monocyte count (p<0.001), prothrombin time (p<0.004), international normalization ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, D-dimer levels, and citrullinated histone (H3) (p< 0.001 for all).
Even after controlling for the state fixed effects, the positive effect of the peer score—the average transparency score of all other hospitals in the same HRR—remained highly significant (0.42; P < 0.001).
The difference was highly significant (P<0.001).
Results Table 1 shows that there were generally highly significant ( p < 0.001) risks for all five morbidity endpoints associated with most of the underlying lifestyle and medical risk factors.
Specifically, there were highly significant positive correlations between hypocotyl length and TPC as well as hypocotyl length and TIC ( p < 0.001), and a significant positive correlation was found between hypocotyl length and saponin content ( p < 0.05).
F ST values indicated highly significant ( p < 0.001) structure among all potential source rookeries except for the two located in RFG1 and RFG4.
Based on the trajectories (0, 1.169, 0.620, and 0.241, respectively for Group I; Group II; Group III, and Group IV) which are highly significant (p<0.001) at all the time intervals, the data suggests that progression of lens abnormalities and maturation of cataract due to STZ-induced hyperglycemia were significantly delayed with feeding of ginger in a dose dependent manner ( Figure 1B ).
The result was highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that mean echogenicity values differ significantly across tissue types.
This difference was not significant in Site 1 (two-way MANOVA, P > 0.05) but was highly significant in Sites 2 and 3 (two-way MANOVA, P < 0.001 in both sites).
This represented a substantial reduction in grain size with the speed sintering procedure, and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The analysis of variance revealed highly significant genotypic effects ( p ≤ 0.001) for traits with moderate-to-high heritability (Table 1 ).
Paired t-test for all PB beverages was highly significant (t = −82.7; p < 0.001).
Ear × Lead Interval effect was also significant, F (4,212) = 3.76, p = .026, Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .028 (Table 3 ), which upon further analysis indicated a highly significant effect of lead interval (direction as described above) in monaural left ear PPI trials, F (1,54) = 12.54, p = .001, Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .001 (mean latency ± 1 SEM , 60-ms left ear PPI: 35.05 ± 0.65 ms; 120-ms PPI: 37.60 ± 0.57 ms); a trend for this effect in right ear PPI trials, F (1,54) = 3.05, p = .086, Greenhouse-Geisser corrected p = .086.