Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp=0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
High-risk tumour depths (≥4mm) demonstrated a highly significant negative dependence on both PO 4 -SMAD2 (Table 2 , C.C −0.214; p=0.001) and PO 4 -SMAD3 (Table 2 , C.C −0.200; p=0.002) ( Supplementary Figures 7A and 8 ) histoscores, suggesting a correlation between thicker tumours and lower SMAD2/3 phosphorylation.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results of ABTS ̇ + radical scavenging activity showed a highly significant ( P < 0.001), very strong correlation with total flavonoid content ( r = 0.943), and a non-significant moderate correlation with total phenolics content ( r = 0.625), indicating that flavonoids may contribute more significantly to the observed antioxidant activity in Pulicaria species than phenolics. 3.5.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, highly significant correlations were observed for recognizing decreased foot blood flow due to diabetes (P < 0.001), emphasizing the importance of foot care for flat feet (p = 0.07), leading a normal life with proper diabetes management (p = 0.001), daily foot checks, inspecting shoes daily (p < 0.001), frequent sock replacement (p = 0.08), inspecting feet for scuffs, and moisturizing feet daily (p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The logistic regression showed a significant impact of vaginal type of delivery and mothers’ university education in a model used for estimating the above-median RCPM test results for both cohorts (OR 2.32, p < 0.01) and a highly significant impact of mothers’ university education in the Karvina and boys groups (OR 6.60 with p < 0.001 and OR 4.55 with p < 0.01, respectively).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
lingzhi The applied microbiological assay to estimate the effect of Reishi supplementation on the growth rate of the applied stains revealed the potential prebiotic effect of the studied mushroom that was confirmed by the highly significant MANOVA overall test (Wilk’s λ < 0.001; p < 0.001) together with the follow-up tests for the measured E. coli and L. casei initial and end count growth rates (F(5;12) > 8.97; p < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Preheated, Buffered, and conventional 2% lignocaine showed statistically significant reduction in intraoperative pain ( P < 0.001) compared to pre-operative but on inter-group comparison preheated and buffered showed highly significant pain reduction compared with conventional 2% lignocaine ( P < 0.001).