Barely Significant
← all phrases

a clear trend

3,140 sentences · 3,140 papers · 30,749 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a clear trendp = 0.030.6× alphagold
Nevertheless, we see a clear trend where, of the CST types, CST I-A at baseline was most strongly associated with NILM at six-months (26/32, 81.2%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12–0.82, p = 0.03, q = 0.15, Fisher’s exact test), while CST IV-A at baseline was most strongly associated with SIL outcomes at six-months (9/15, 60%, OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.03–9.40, p = 0.04, q = 0.16), however, the associations were only moderate when corrected for multiple testing (FDR < 0.2) (Fig. 2 a-b).
a clear trendp = 0.0330.7× alphagold
A clear trend between the abundance of the primary bile acids CDCA (p = 0.033, FC-log 2 = 3.3), CA (p = 0.110, FC-log 2 = 1.6), and their taurine conjugates (Tau-CDCA: p = 0.067, FC-log 2 = −3.0; Tau-CA: p = 0.110, FC-log 2 = −3.0) between the experimental groups was observed ( Figure 5 E), although only one was regarded as significant based on their p values.
a clear trendP = 0.051.0× alphagold
Although the association of THRIVE with decreased risk of reflux did not reach the statistical difference, a clear trend that THRIVE reduced the incidence of reflux was observed (RR = 0.24, P = 0.05).
a clear trendP < 0.051.0× alphagold
As the drying process advances, there is a clear trend of T 21 and T 22 relaxation times shifting toward lower relaxation times, coupled with a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the corresponding integral areas, reflecting the gradual depletion of immobilized water within the muscle fiber structure and free water in the extracellular spaces.
a clear trendP < 0.051.0× alphagold
The OPLS-DA score plot showed a clear trend towards separation between the two groups, and the currently established discriminant model with R2Y cum = 0.366 ( P < 0.05) and Q2 cum = 0.129 ( P < 0.05) allowed for a valid distinction between the two samples, indicating that there were indeed metabolic differences between the case and control groups.
a clear trendp = 0.05051.0× alphagold
In the CeL, a clear trend ( p = 0.0505, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc tests) for increased GFAP (+) signals at chronic SNL compared to acute SNL was observed, but there were no statistically significant differences between the three groups ( Figure 1C , sham = 10, SNL 1w = 10, SNL 4w = 10 total GFAP (+) sample areas pe